Liste des Groupes | Revenir à cl c |
Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:Yes. I don't need to look at my fingers/the keyboard, but I do need to concentrate on the code. Give me a azerty layout and I'm back to one finger and searching.On 28/02/2025 23:32, Richard Harnden wrote:I suspect two different points are being made. Touch-typing withoutOn 28/02/2025 21:10, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:>On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:21:01 +0000, Richard Harnden wrote:Exactly. They didn't need to look at what they were typing, because
>Have your mental margin-bell ding at around 75 characters ...>
What was the ding for? Was it because typists were not in the habit
of
looking at what they were typing?
they could touch-type. It's why the F and J keys have the little
bumps - so you'd know where you were. They'd be looking only at
what they where copying, so the audible cue was necessary. They
could hit 90+ words per minute.
Very impressive, but not a skill a programmer needs.
MMMV.
>
You do you, obviously, but touch-typing can easily double your typing
speed. It never ceases to amaze me that the NHS claims their doctors
are overworked but can't be arsed to teach them to touch-type.
looking at the keyboard is important for programmers. Touch-typing
without looking at the text being typed is less so.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.