Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 10. Mar 2025, 20:22:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vqne58$1g7jq$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/03/2025 19:11, Dan Cross wrote:
In article <vqnd5c$1g7jq$1@dont-email.me>,
Richard Heathfield  <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote:
On 10/03/2025 15:42, Dan Cross wrote:
So far, as near as I can tell, the only person who's actually
engaged with the proposal was Tim Rentsch
>
I responded at 12:13GMT, but my reply appears to have sunk
without trace. Maybe I'm not the only one whose response has gone
AWOL.
 It occurs to me that if it was cross-posted to n.g.p, it may be
waiting for moderator approval.
Had I spotted that I was posting outside comp.programming, I wouldn't have bothered to reply. It was an off the cuff response that didn't merit the time it would take a moderator to sit in judgement over it. If you see him, please convey my apologies.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Date Sujet#  Auteur
10 Mar 25 * Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?23Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 +* Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?17Kenny McCormack
10 Mar 25 i`* Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?16Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 i +* Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?2Richard Heathfield
10 Mar 25 i i`- Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?1Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 i `* Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)13Kenny McCormack
10 Mar 25 i  `* Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)12Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 i   +- Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)1Michael S
10 Mar 25 i   +* Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)2Tim Rentsch
10 Mar 25 i   i`- Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)1Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 i   +* Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)2David Brown
10 Mar 25 i   i`- Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)1Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 i   +* Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)4Richard Heathfield
10 Mar 25 i   i`* Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)3Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 i   i `* Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)2Richard Heathfield
10 Mar 25 i   i  `- Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)1Dan Cross
10 Mar 25 i   +- Re: Topicality (Was: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?)1Kenny McCormack
11 Mar 25 i   `- Re: Topicality1Keith Thompson
10 Mar 25 +- Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?1Kaz Kylheku
11 Mar 25 `* Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?4Lynn McGuire
11 Mar 25  `* Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?3Dan Cross
12 Mar 25   `* Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?2Lynn McGuire
12 Mar 25    `- Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?1Dan Cross

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal