Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?
De : Keith.S.Thompson+u (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Keith Thompson)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 11. Mar 2025, 04:17:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None to speak of
Message-ID : <87cyeogss0.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:
I just saw a post on news.announce.newgroups posted 2025-01-03, subject
"1st RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator".
>
"This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to remove the following
101 moderated newsgroups."
>
comp.lang.c.moderated is on the list.
>
Seebs was the moderator of comp.lang.c.moderated, but has
not participated since 2014.  There have been no posts on
comp.lang.c.moderated since then.
>
There have been discussions here in comp.lang.c in 2018 and 2021
about reviving comp.lang.c.moderated.  I emailed Seebs about this
at the time, and he expressed tentative interesting in seeing it
revived, but with someone else moderating it.
>
My tentative opinion is that it's probably not worth reviving,
but if others are sufficiently interested *and* someone volunteers
to moderate it, perhaps it could be done.  If it were revived,
I'd certainly subscribe and participate.
>
One possible concern is that if comp.lang.c.moderated is removed,
historical posts might be lost.  I don't know whether that's
a valid concern.  It might depend on the policies of individual
Usenet servers and archives.

Seebs replied to my email:
"""
I'd be happy to hand it off to someone but I'm pretty overwhelmed
right now and couldn't actually participate. But I still have the
account and could hand it off.

-s
"""

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Mar 25 * Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?11Keith Thompson
11 Mar 25 +- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Keith Thompson
11 Mar 25 +* Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?2David Brown
13 Mar 25 i`- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1John McCue
12 Mar 25 +* Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?5Tim Rentsch
12 Mar 25 i+* Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?2Richard Heathfield
13 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Ben Bacarisse
12 Mar 25 i+- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Keith Thompson
12 Mar 25 i`- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Dan Cross
13 Mar 25 +- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Keith Thompson
5 May 25 `- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal