Newsportal USENET - Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?

Sujet : Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?
De : rjh (at) *nospam* cpax.org.uk (Richard Heathfield)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 12. Mar 2025, 05:37:10

Autres entêtes

Organisation : Fix this later
Message-ID : <vqr31m$2e4bo$8@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird

On 12/03/2025 04:28, Tim Rentsch wrote:

I am in favor of reviving comp.lang.c.moderated, and hope a
suitable moderating arrangement can be found.
Technical question: is it feasible to have moderating duties
be shared among several people on some sort of rotating basis?
I have no experience moderating a usenet news group.

Neither have I. A few years ago I came close to moderating clcm, but I skipped out of Seebs's way just in time.
I have no desire to end up being /the/ moderator, but would gladly share the task if a pool of good folk could be agreed upon.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

Date	Sujet	#	Auteur
11 Mar 25	Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?	11	Keith Thompson
11 Mar 25	Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?	1	Keith Thompson
11 Mar 25	Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?	2	David Brown
13 Mar 25	Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?	1	John McCue
12 Mar 25	Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?	5	Tim Rentsch
12 Mar 25	Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?	2	Richard Heathfield
13 Mar 25	Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?	1	Ben Bacarisse
12 Mar 25	Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?	1	Keith Thompson
12 Mar 25	Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?	1	Dan Cross
13 Mar 25	Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?	1	Keith Thompson
5 May 25	Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?	1	Keith Thompson