Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?
De : cross (at) *nospam* spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 12. Mar 2025, 10:14:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID : <vqrj9r$ia4$2@reader1.panix.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <86h63yub2r.fsf@linuxsc.com>,
Tim Rentsch  <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
I am in favor of reviving comp.lang.c.moderated, and hope a
suitable moderating arrangement can be found.
>
Technical question:  is it feasible to have moderating duties
be shared among several people on some sort of rotating basis?
I have no experience moderating a usenet news group.

It is; or at least it is possible to set up a pool to share the
responsibility.  I understand the software is often a bit janky
and may need some work.

-Dan C.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Mar 25 * Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?11Keith Thompson
11 Mar 25 +- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Keith Thompson
11 Mar 25 +* Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?2David Brown
13 Mar 25 i`- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1John McCue
12 Mar 25 +* Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?5Tim Rentsch
12 Mar 25 i+* Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?2Richard Heathfield
13 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Ben Bacarisse
12 Mar 25 i+- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Keith Thompson
12 Mar 25 i`- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Dan Cross
13 Mar 25 +- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Keith Thompson
5 May 25 `- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal