Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?
De : jmccue (at) *nospam* qball.jmcunx.com (John McCue)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 13. Mar 2025, 15:39:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vquqm9$3bbl5$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (OpenBSD/7.6 (amd64))
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
<snip?
 
However, I cannot imagine it receiving much traffic.

This is my belief also, especially with google groups
posts not arriving here anymore.

<snip>

So it is hard for me to imagine that it would be worth the effort.

I agree, IIRC even when it was active decades ago, it did
not have a huge amount of posts.  But back then clc was
filled with spam, so I went to clcm for a while until it
seems the mods disappeared.

<snip>

--
[t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age."
                        - Paraphrasing Star Wars

Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Mar 25 * Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?11Keith Thompson
11 Mar 25 +- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Keith Thompson
11 Mar 25 +* Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?2David Brown
13 Mar 25 i`- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1John McCue
12 Mar 25 +* Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?5Tim Rentsch
12 Mar 25 i+* Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?2Richard Heathfield
13 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Ben Bacarisse
12 Mar 25 i+- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Keith Thompson
12 Mar 25 i`- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Dan Cross
13 Mar 25 +- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Keith Thompson
5 May 25 `- Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?1Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal