Re: Python recompile

On 14/03/2025 21:15, bart wrote:

On 14/03/2025 19:37, Richard Harnden wrote:

On 14/03/2025 19:04, bart wrote:

After all no one (according to you) was complaining about grappling with 100 discrete files.

>
100 discrete files helps 100 developers not to step on each other's toes.
>
And most of those 100 .o's won't need to be recompiled on every make.
It's quicker and easier.
>

 That may be true about the people who /develop/ this sqlite3 product.
 But this is a file created to ease deployment by people who want to / use/ it.

This is a newsgroup populated by developers.
Users won't be going anywhere near a compiler - they'll get shipped the binary.

 I don't know why nobody in this group can grasp that concept even though I've explained it a hundred times. For example, I have a transpiler product that turns a 50-module project in my language into a single, easy-to-build C source file.
 But everyone makes the same point about it being hard to manage. No one is even going to look inside it!