Re: Python recompile

On 15/03/2025 02:30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 23:16:06 +0000, bart wrote:
 

Every single post arguing against me implies that it is effortless: that
is, all you have to do is type 'make'.
>
NO ONE wants to admit to building can be a difficult process.

 You don’t have to take anybody’s word for it. Spend a few weeks doing some
builds and development on a Linux system for yourself. The difference
between Windows and Linux is like night and day.

Spend a few weeks using my language. The difference between how it works and what you do on Linux is even starker.
There /is/ no build system speak of. Compiling any program even of 100 modules is this invocation:
    mm prog                # prog.m is the lead module
Or you can forget about building completely, and just run direct from source code:
    mm -r prog             # (via native code)
    mm -i prog             # (interpreted)
If there's a simpler way to compile or run source code, I'd like to know what it is!
C is a little different because the language doesn't allow for automatic discovery of modules. But the extra info needed is simple: a list of files.
For single-module programs however, my C compile works just like 'mm' above.