Sujet : By definition... (Was: Bart's Language)
De : gazelle (at) *nospam* shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 23. Mar 2025, 18:20:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID : <vrpfto$ja88$1@news.xmission.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
vrmln3$7dks$1@dont-email.me>,
James Kuyper <
jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
...
There is no such requirement. Could you identify who made such a claim,
when, with what arguments? My newserver's archives only go back three
months, and if the claim was made by somebody I've got killfiled, ...
If it was by somebody you've KF'd, then, by definition, you don't want to
read it. So, we are all doing you a favor by not identifying the post.
Wouldn't want you to hurt your tender eyes.
-- The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4lines long. As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs. In order to remainin compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL: http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/ThePublicGood