Sujet : Re: Integral types and own type definitions (was Re: Suggested method for returning a string from a C program?)
De : 643-408-1753 (at) *nospam* kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 25. Mar 2025, 17:22:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20250325091721.977@kylheku.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
On 2025-03-25, Michael S <
already5chosen@yahoo.com> wrote:
[re: "integral"]
Wouldn't the term 'whole numbers' be preferred in everyday English?
The everyday adjective "integral" is not used in a mathematical
sense of denoting integers; e.g. "vitamin C is an integral part
of a human diet" doesn't mean "whole number part of a human diet".
Sure, the adjective "whole" serves informally as "integral";
as in 2 3/4 has a whole part of 2, and a fractional part of 3/4.
-- TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txrCygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnalMastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca