Sujet : Re: Integral types and own type definitions (was Re: Suggested method for returning a string from a C program?)
De : tr.17687 (at) *nospam* z991.linuxsc.com (Tim Rentsch)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 25. Mar 2025, 21:23:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <86zfh8j1vm.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Michael S <
already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 05:02:45 -0700
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>
Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
[...]
Wouldn't the term 'whole numbers' be preferred in everyday English?
>
"Whole numbers" are all non-negative.
>
"Integers" include values less than zero.
>
Sounds like English everyday use differs from two other languages that
I know relatively well in both of which "whole" numbers include
negatives.
Addendum: doing a web search for "whole numbers" turned up several
pages that gave a definition for the term, and in all cases the
set of numbers identified included all and only the non-negative
integers (typical definition was "counting numbers plus zero").