Sujet : [OT] PC hardware prices [correction] (was Re: The integral type 'byte')
De : janis_papanagnou+ng (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Janis Papanagnou)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 31. Mar 2025, 20:35:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vseqpe$13c73$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 28.03.2025 02:05, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
On 27.03.2025 12:14, bart wrote:
On 27/03/2025 02:24, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
>
I'm speaking about all that inferior systems that had a comparably
high price without a matching quality. And about years and years
passing without vendors of such products changing that situation.
>
I guess ... you're talking about either the IBM PC hardware or MS
software, or both? (Although PCs weren't expensive.)
Here PCs were expensive; a friend of mine bought one for ~8000 DM,
IIRC, (compare that to 2000 DM for a Commodore PET; even the first
Apple was expensive but not that expensive as the IBM PC).
Upon reconsideration it appeared to me that the price estimates do
not reflect their _original_ price. It was ~3000 DM for the PET and
~12000 DM for the IBM XT. (Although prices rapidly dropped after the
first years of their release, as I've just verified; that's were my
"2000 DM" memories stems from). - So they were actually even *more*
expensive (and rarely commonly affordable). - That doesn't change my
point (rather it supports it yet more), but I wanted the numbers to
get fixed.
Janis
[...]