Re: enums and switch vs function calls

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: enums and switch vs function calls
De : tr.17687 (at) *nospam* z991.linuxsc.com (Tim Rentsch)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 07. Apr 2025, 03:26:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <8634ekg11g.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:

Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
>
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
>
[... gcc verbose error messages ...]

One line of informative error message followed by 5 lines of
useless cruft to wade through.  And no way to turn it off
completely.
>
That's true, but it can be reduced to only two lines total (so
only one line more than needed), by using
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret.
>
Yes, I use that.  I still find that the "note:" lines clutter the
output and provide zero benefit.

I sympathize with your reaction.  My response was meant only to
provide information to anyone not aware of it.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
5 Apr 25 * enums and switch vs function calls12Richard Harnden
5 Apr 25 +* Re: enums and switch vs function calls9Stefan Ram
5 Apr 25 i+- Re: enums and switch vs function calls1David Brown
5 Apr 25 i+- Re: enums and switch vs function calls1Stefan Ram
6 Apr 25 i`* Re: enums and switch vs function calls6Tim Rentsch
6 Apr 25 i +- Re: enums and switch vs function calls1David Brown
7 Apr 25 i +- Re: enums and switch vs function calls1Tim Rentsch
25 Apr 25 i `* Re: enums and switch vs function calls3Ben Bacarisse
25 Apr 25 i  `* Re: enums and switch vs function calls2Ben Bacarisse
4 May 25 i   `- Re: enums and switch vs function calls1Tim Rentsch
5 Apr 25 `* Re: enums and switch vs function calls2Thiago Adams
6 Apr 25  `- Re: enums and switch vs function calls1David Brown

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal