Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types"

bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:

On 08/04/2025 22:46, Keith Thompson wrote:

bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:

>

Clearly, they're not quite as fully supported as short, int etc; they
are usually just aliases. But that needn't stop them being shown on
such a chart.

Apparently the author of the chart chose to include types that are
defined by the core language, not by the library.

>
So here you're finally admitteding they are a different rank.

I'm not "finally admitting" anything.  I don't know or care what you
mean by "rank" (it happens to be a technical term in the standard, but
that's clearly not what you meant).

[SNIP]

Actually I can't quite see the purpose of this chart, why it has to be
so complicated (even with bits missing) or who it is for.

So you're wasting time arguing about something you don't even care
about.  Consider not doing that anymore.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */