Re: do { quit; } else { }

Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:

Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:

Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:

[...]

I withdraw my earlier statement.  Please leave me out of any
future discussion of the subject.

>
Do you mean that your earlier statement was incorrect (i.e., that
the types are compatible), or do you merely wish to pretend you
never said anything without taking a position on whether they're
compatible, or do you refuse to say?

>
I am specifically _not_ saying either that my earlier statement
was right or that my earlier statement was wrong.  My hope is
that henceforth people will act as though the statement never
entered the discussion.  Does that clarify the matter for you?

That answers precisely what I was asking, thank you.

As often happens, I am mystified by your decision, but it is
unquestionably yours.

I'll try not to include you in any further discussion, but I do
not promise to try very hard.

Don't worry, I'm not planning to start or participate in a
lengthy discussion on your statement (that never turns out well).
I'm inviting you to clarify if you choose to do so.  [...]

>
I appreciate the invitation and have made an earnest effort
to accommodate it.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */