Re: do { quit; } else { }

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: do { quit; } else { }
De : david.brown (at) *nospam* hesbynett.no (David Brown)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 13. Apr 2025, 19:53:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vth16f$3g7ar$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 13/04/2025 19:57, Michael S wrote:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:15:44 -0700
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
 
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
[...]
8 A u64 type can be denoted as either 'uint64_t' OR as some
combination of the tokens (long, long, unsigned, [int])
>
"uint64_t" and "unsigned long long int" do not mean the same thing.
>
 And it's a PITA.
 
There is only one thing I find a little bit annoying about the sized integer types in C - the printf specifiers.  I tend to "cheat" with these, using "%lu" for uint32_t on the targets I usually use, where I know uint32_t is "long unsigned int".  Other than that, I stick to the size-specific types for much of my code except local "throw-away" variables that might be "int".  Compatibility or lack thereof between the size-specific types and the standard integer types is simply irrelevant in my code.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Jul 25 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal