Sujet : Re: do { quit; } else { }
De : Keith.S.Thompson+u (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Keith Thompson)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 14. Apr 2025, 04:26:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None to speak of
Message-ID : <87cydf4e5d.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
James Kuyper <
jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
On 4/13/25 21:33, Keith Thompson wrote:
James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
On 4/13/25 17:30, Michael S wrote:
...
My impression rfrom old books was that indexing as [i]arr was (is ?)
>
Note: [i]arr
[...]
He's not talking about E2[E1]. He's talking about [E2]E1.
D'oh, I missed that. Apparently I saw what I was expecting to see.
I don't recall [i]arr (or [arr]i) being valid in any version of C
or any of its predecessors -- or any other language, for that matter.
-- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.comvoid Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */