Sujet : Re: do { quit; } else { }
De : janis_papanagnou+ng (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Janis Papanagnou)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 14. Apr 2025, 04:59:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vti16g$er5g$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 13.04.2025 18:48, bart wrote:
On 13/04/2025 15:54, Scott Lurndal wrote:
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
On 13/04/2025 12:33, bart wrote:
>
Algol68 fits the role of systems language;
>
It somehow lost the word 'poorly'!
>
That would suprise Burroughs/Unisys, where the operating
system, database and utilites are all written in Algol.
Algol68 or Algol60? The former is very different.
I don't recall whether it was "Burroughs/Unisys" (that Scott mentioned)
but I know that there were systems programmed in Algol 68.
If you know Algol 60 you'd probably have recognized that it's unsuited
for systems programming (as opposed to Algol 68). - At least IMO.
Janis
[...]