Liste des Groupes | Revenir à cl c |
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:<Face-palm>On 15/04/2025 05:57, Rosario19 wrote:Because it can't do this:On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:18:39 +0200, Janis Papanagnou wrote:>(While there's some "C" stuff in here it contains a lot of non-"C">
samples for comparison. So [OT]-sensible folks may want to skip this
post.)
>
On 14.04.2025 12:16, bart wrote:On 14/04/2025 05:23, Janis Papanagnou wrote:On 13.04.2025 18:39, bart wrote:[...]
>
for(let i = 1; i <= 36; i++) {
C for loop is great, but all can be workarounded with goto label
For this specific example (ignore 'let' for C), please explain why it is
better than, say:
>
FOR(i,1,36) {
for(tp = root; tp != NULL; tp = tp->next)
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.