Sujet : Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types"
De : jameskuyper (at) *nospam* alumni.caltech.edu (James Kuyper)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 16. Apr 2025, 02:02:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vtmvja$tfkg$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/15/25 18:58, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:06:55 -0400, James Kuyper wrote:
On 4/15/25 00:11, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
Unfortunately, whoever threw in references to historical details to try
to make the stories seem more plausible didn’t try very hard to keep
them consistent.
>
That's why there's a range of possible dates ...
No, there is no date that fits the claimed historical references.
That's the norm, not the exception, for events that obscure which
happened that long ago. A historian who insisted that every date be
consistent with every possible source before he could talk about an
event that supposedly happened on that date would have very little to
talk about prior to about 1800.