Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { })

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { })
De : Keith.S.Thompson+u (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Keith Thompson)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 17. Apr 2025, 03:18:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None to speak of
Message-ID : <87ikn3zg18.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
[...]
The increment is part of its behaviour. At the language level, I could
explain how FOR is implemented, but I'd rather not do that.

Whereas for a language like C which is defined by a written standard,
the standard *must* specify the behavior at the language level
(not in terms of generated intermediate or machine code).

The fact that
    for (int i = INT_MAX-1; i <= INT_MAX; i++);
has undefined behavior can be rigorously inferred from the language
definition.

A note that upper and lower limits must be in the range i64.min + s
.. i64.max - s (where s is the step size) can suffice.
>
What's far more useful is that it naturally works with i64 so has
limits 4 billion times bigger than you get with C's default 'int'
type.

You know, of course, that C's int type is not necessarily 32 bits.
There is no "default" for the width of int.  If you had written "with
32-bit int", that would have been clear and correct.

[...]

Maybe the language can detect overflow, but it won't help, as you want
to loop to stop not abort the program. So it is not a solution.

If you want to implement, say, an Ada-style for loop, detecting
overflow is not an issue at the language level.  The issue is that
for the following (I think the Ada syntax is clear enough):

    for I in Integer'Last-1 .. Integer'Last loop
        // whatever
    end loop;

the language semantics specify that the body of the loop must be
executed with I equal to Integer'Last-1, and then with I equal to
Integer'Last.  It's the compiler's job to figure out how to do that,
either without triggering an overflow or by handling it cleanly enough
that it doesn't change the behavior.

C's for loop, which is both lower level and more flexible, does not
impose that particular burden on the compiler.  It's up to the
programmer to ensure that a given for loop behaves as desired.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Apr 25 * do { quit; } else { }625Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 +* Re: do { quit; } else { }2bart
4 Apr 25 i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 +* Re: do { quit; } else { }11Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 25 i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 25 ii `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Chris M. Thomasson
4 Apr 25 i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }4Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 25 ii+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 iii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Thiago Adams
8 Apr 25 ii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1candycanearter07
5 Apr 25 i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Janis Papanagnou
5 Apr 25 i +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Janis Papanagnou
6 Apr 25 i `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Michael S
4 Apr 25 +* Re: do { quit; } else { }608Tim Rentsch
4 Apr 25 i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }607Thiago Adams
6 Apr 25 i +* Re: do { quit; } else { }600Tim Rentsch
6 Apr 25 i i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }550Michael S
6 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }549Tim Rentsch
6 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: do { quit; } else { }548Michael S
7 Apr 25 i ii  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }547Tim Rentsch
7 Apr 25 i ii   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }546Michael S
7 Apr 25 i ii    +* Re: do { quit; } else { }542bart
8 Apr 25 i ii    i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }541David Brown
8 Apr 25 i ii    i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }540bart
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  +* Re: do { quit; } else { }535David Brown
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }534bart
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i +* Re: do { quit; } else { }78Tim Rentsch
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }77bart
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i +* Re: do { quit; } else { }74Tim Rentsch
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }73bart
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }72Tim Rentsch
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }71bart
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i   +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i   +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }68Tim Rentsch
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    +* Re: do { quit; } else { }63bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }61Kaz Kylheku
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Michael S
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    iii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Kaz Kylheku
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }58bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii +* Re: do { quit; } else { }43Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }39bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii+* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]16bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iii+* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]14Janis Papanagnou
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii`* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]13bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii `* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]10David Brown
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii  `* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]9bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   +* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]5Michael S
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   i`* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]4bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   i `* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]3Michael S
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   i  +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Janis Papanagnou
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   i  `- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1David Brown
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   +- Re: Endless complaints1Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   `- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iii`- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }22Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii `* Re: do { quit; } else { }21bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }20Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }19Michael S
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    +* Re: do { quit; } else { }16Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    ii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
13 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }13Michael S
12 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }12Tim Rentsch
12 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }11David Brown
12 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }10Keith Thompson
13 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i    `* Re: do { quit; } else { }9David Brown
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i     `* Re: do { quit; } else { }8James Kuyper
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      +* Re: do { quit; } else { }6Keith Thompson
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }4James Kuyper
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }3David Brown
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      ii +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Kaz Kylheku
15 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      ii `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1James Kuyper
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Tim Rentsch
6 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii i  `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii `* Re: do { quit; } else { }14Kaz Kylheku
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  +* Re: do { quit; } else { }11bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }6Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }5Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii `* Re: do { quit; } else { }4Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii   +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1bart
5 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii   `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  i+- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
9 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    `* Re: do { quit; } else { }4Bonita Montero
9 May 25 i ii    i  i i i     `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Richard Heathfield
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Richard Damon
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }455David Brown
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Ike Naar
8 Apr 25 i ii    `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Tim Rentsch
6 Apr 25 i i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }49Michael S
7 May 25 i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }6Wuns Haerst
6 Apr 25 +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Apr 25 +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
18 Apr 25 `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal