Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types"

On 17.04.2025 17:56, David Brown wrote:

On 16/04/2025 02:53, James Kuyper wrote:

On 4/15/25 18:56, Keith Thompson wrote:
...

The uncertainty in the timing of January 1, 1970, where 1970 is a
year number in the current almost universally accepted Gregorian
calendar, is essentially zero.

>
Modern Cesium clock are accurate to about 1 ns/day.That's an effect
large enough that we can measure it, but cannot correct for it. We know
that the clocks disagree with each other, but the closest we can do to
correcting for that instability is to average over 450 different clock;
the average is 10 times more stable than the individual clocks.
>
Note: the precision of cesium clocks has improved log-linearly since the
1950s. They're 6 orders of magnitude better in 2008 than they were in
1950. Who knows how much longer that will continue to be true?
>

 
I don't think cesium is still the current standard for the highest
precision atomic clocks.

Well, the "Cesium _fountain_" atomic clocks are still amongst
the most precise and they are in use in the world wide net of
atomic clocks that are interconnected to measure TAI.[*]  And
the standard second is _defined_ on Caesium based transitions.

But anyway, the newest breakthrough is thorium
nuclear clocks, which IIRC are 5 orders of magnitude more stable than
cesium clocks.  (And probably 5 orders of magnitude more expensive...)

I've not heard of Thorium based clocks. But I've heard of
"optical clocks" that are developed to get more precise and
more stable versions of atomic clock times.

Janis

[*]
https://www.ptb.de/cms/index.php?eID=tx_cms_showpic&file=277826&md5=7fb5fb394664810269e3e2d5204bb50950e98b4c&parameters%5B0%5D=eyJ3aWR0aCI6IjkwMG0iLCJoZWlnaHQiOiI3MDBtIiwiYm9keVRhZyI6Ijxib2R5&parameters%5B1%5D=IHN0eWxlPVwibWFyZ2luOjA7IGJhY2tncm91bmQ6I2ZmZjtcIj4iLCJ3cmFwIjoi&parameters%5B2%5D=PGEgaHJlZj1cImphdmFzY3JpcHQ6Y2xvc2UoKTtcIj4gfCA8XC9hPiJ9

Shorter link in German:
https://www.ptb.de/cms/fileadmin/_processed_/csm_2022-08_TAI._deutsch_7a19aa286d.jpg

[...]