Re: Only C programmers tell the truth about the behavior of DD simulated by HHH

On 4/21/2025 5:28 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-04-20 15:14:11 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 4/20/2025 2:49 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-04-19 20:26:59 +0000, olcott said:
>

On 4/19/2025 4:20 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:

Am 19.04.2025 um 10:03 schrieb Mikko:
>

The part that comp.lang.c lacked a liar sounds credible.

>
I believe Peter has a serious mental illness. As far as I know,
he has cancer, and I hope he gets the most out of his remaining
life instead of obsessing over this problem.

>
I never go with credible, instead I try to stick with verified facts.
>
int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
>
It is a verified fact that DD correctly simulated
by HHH cannot possibly halt (terminate normally).

>
Verified facts should not be decorated with misleading words.
>
There is no other "DD correctly simulated by HHH" than the DD shown
above, and that DD halts (terminates normally).

>
Why lie?

 The "why" does not matter. It helps readers that your lies are pointed
out

I haven't even made any mistake. Why are you lying
about the behavior of DD simulated by HHH including
HHH simulating itself simulating DD?
It is pretty stupid to keep trying to get away with
the intentional deception of the straw-man by referring
to behavior OTHER THAN DD EMULATED BY HHH THAT EMULATES
ITSELF EMULATING DD.

even if your motivation to lie remains obscure. Even whether your
deception is intentional or unintended does not matter, only that the
truth is told.
 

You are the Liar here.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer