Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { })

Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:

bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:

[SNIP]

While the C version looks intimidating, this looks much cleaner and
simpler (expanding those macros helped).

>
*You* find it much cleaner and simpler.  I don't.  What makes you right
and everyone else wrong?
>
Just once, can you acknowledge that others have different opinions than
you do?  I don't recall that you've ever done that (while I've done it
repeatedly).

[...]

You've already replied to the parent article, but you snipped
the above questions with no indication that you had done so.

Will you answer them?  Will you at least acnowledge that I asked?

Closely related: Do you want me to continue discussing this with you?

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */