Re: Only C programmers tell the truth about the behavior of DD simulated by HHH

On 2025-04-21 11:33:38 +0000, olcott said:

On 4/21/2025 5:28 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-04-20 15:14:11 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 4/20/2025 2:49 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 2025-04-19 20:26:59 +0000, olcott said:
 

On 4/19/2025 4:20 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:

Am 19.04.2025 um 10:03 schrieb Mikko:
 

The part that comp.lang.c lacked a liar sounds credible.

 I believe Peter has a serious mental illness. As far as I know,
he has cancer, and I hope he gets the most out of his remaining
life instead of obsessing over this problem.

 I never go with credible, instead I try to stick with verified facts.
 int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}
 It is a verified fact that DD correctly simulated
by HHH cannot possibly halt (terminate normally).

 Verified facts should not be decorated with misleading words.
 There is no other "DD correctly simulated by HHH" than the DD shown
above, and that DD halts (terminates normally).

 Why lie?

 The "why" does not matter. It helps readers that your lies are pointed
out

 I haven't even made any mistake. Why are you lying
about the behavior of DD simulated by HHH including
HHH simulating itself simulating DD?

That you call me a liar without being able to quote any lie can be called
a mistake though I would prever to call it an error. Where I live it is a
crime to call someone a liar without a proof of a lie.
--
Mikko