Sujet : Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { })
De : janis_papanagnou+ng (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (Janis Papanagnou)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 22. Apr 2025, 09:32:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vu7k6m$7e7j$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
On 22.04.2025 01:46, Scott Lurndal wrote:
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>
I guess that answers that question! I'd use macros only as a last
resort; you would use them at the first opportunity.
(Again exaggerating and imputations. *sigh* - Abandon all hope, ye
who enter here.)
Obviously the entire world-wide programming community
disagrees with your opinions.
Well, I certainly disagree with the (so well known) exaggerations of
bart, but I have a similar principle here; I avoid macros if I can.
I like languages where every construct is under "direct control" of
the compiler with a single abstraction principle (as opposed to
two-step interpretations). It's all not worth a discussion, I think,
and I certainly see and acknowledge "valid" applications of macros.
Just saying that I understand his reluctance here.
Janis