Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { })

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { })
De : 643-408-1753 (at) *nospam* kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 23. Apr 2025, 01:01:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20250422164415.883@kylheku.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
On 2025-04-22, bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
If you're going to criticize the macros, then hold the code constant.
 
If it is a given requirement that some code is to be written or
generated, and we have some macros which do that, are those macros a
"good" or "bad" solution?
>
Why use macros at all?

You need to repeat some verbose coding pattern without copy-and-paste
mistakes. If that coding pattern has a bug or has to be revised for any
reason, you want to do it in one place.

You need to control the evaluation of an argument expression, rather
than just receive its value.

You need to set up some code that declares variables or interacts
with declared identifiers in scope.

They might be a big deal in your own language, but in my experience,
largely in C, they seem to cause nothing but grief.

But:

  for_sqlite_hash(p, hash) { ... }

has only one simple level of expansion; saves typing, no grief.

The fact that Lua has some grotty macros in its VM doesn't speak
to a nice use of macros, like what I was talking about.

You comitted a slippery slope type fallacy, or similar,  by bringing
that up. "Macros /can/ be layered to 10 layers deeper and make the logic
inscrutable, therefore all macros are a bad idea, including a simple,
single-expansion iteration macro for sqlite hashes."

Here, it produces neither faster code nor smaller.

That's neither here nor there; all that matters is whether it's a good
way to produce the code that the author wanted.

Additionally, it may be possible to replace the implementation of the
macro such that it generates some other code that is faster, and such
that it remains compatible; all the calls to the macro remain valid, and
so new code for handling all the opcodes is generated.

The macro is called like this:

  op_arith(L, l_addi, luai_numadd);

that's pretty abstract; chances are it could be preserved if
the implementation strategy were substantially altered.

--
TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr
Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal
Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Apr 25 * do { quit; } else { }625Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 +* Re: do { quit; } else { }2bart
4 Apr 25 i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 +* Re: do { quit; } else { }11Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 25 i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 25 ii `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Chris M. Thomasson
4 Apr 25 i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }4Kaz Kylheku
4 Apr 25 ii+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Thiago Adams
4 Apr 25 iii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Thiago Adams
8 Apr 25 ii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1candycanearter07
5 Apr 25 i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Janis Papanagnou
5 Apr 25 i +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Janis Papanagnou
6 Apr 25 i `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Michael S
4 Apr 25 +* Re: do { quit; } else { }608Tim Rentsch
4 Apr 25 i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }607Thiago Adams
6 Apr 25 i +* Re: do { quit; } else { }600Tim Rentsch
6 Apr 25 i i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }550Michael S
6 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }549Tim Rentsch
6 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: do { quit; } else { }548Michael S
7 Apr 25 i ii  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }547Tim Rentsch
7 Apr 25 i ii   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }546Michael S
7 Apr 25 i ii    +* Re: do { quit; } else { }542bart
8 Apr 25 i ii    i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }541David Brown
8 Apr 25 i ii    i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }540bart
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  +* Re: do { quit; } else { }535David Brown
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }534bart
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i +* Re: do { quit; } else { }78Tim Rentsch
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }77bart
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i +* Re: do { quit; } else { }74Tim Rentsch
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }73bart
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }72Tim Rentsch
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }71bart
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i   +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i   +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }68Tim Rentsch
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    +* Re: do { quit; } else { }63bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }61Kaz Kylheku
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Michael S
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    iii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Kaz Kylheku
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }58bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii +* Re: do { quit; } else { }43Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }39bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii+* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]16bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iii+* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]14Janis Papanagnou
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii`* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]13bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii `* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]10David Brown
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii  `* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]9bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   +* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]5Michael S
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   i`* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]4bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   i `* Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]3Michael S
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   i  +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Janis Papanagnou
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   i  `- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   +- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1David Brown
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   +- Re: Endless complaints1Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iiii   `- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii iii`- Re: Endless complaints [was Re: do { quit; } else { }]1Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }22Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii `* Re: do { quit; } else { }21bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }20Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }19Michael S
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    +* Re: do { quit; } else { }16Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    ii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
13 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }13Michael S
12 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }12Tim Rentsch
12 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }11David Brown
12 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i   `* Re: do { quit; } else { }10Keith Thompson
13 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i    `* Re: do { quit; } else { }9David Brown
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i     `* Re: do { quit; } else { }8James Kuyper
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      +* Re: do { quit; } else { }6Keith Thompson
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }4James Kuyper
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }3David Brown
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      ii +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Kaz Kylheku
15 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      ii `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1James Kuyper
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
14 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    i      `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii ii    `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Tim Rentsch
6 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii i  `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii `* Re: do { quit; } else { }14Kaz Kylheku
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  +* Re: do { quit; } else { }11bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }2Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1bart
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  i+* Re: do { quit; } else { }6Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii`* Re: do { quit; } else { }5Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii `* Re: do { quit; } else { }4Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii   +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1bart
5 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  ii   `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  i+- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Keith Thompson
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1bart
10 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    ii  `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Kaz Kylheku
11 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i i    i`- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
9 May 25 i ii    i  i i i    `* Re: do { quit; } else { }4Bonita Montero
9 May 25 i ii    i  i i i     `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Richard Heathfield
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Richard Damon
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i i `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }455David Brown
8 Apr 25 i ii    i  +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Tim Rentsch
9 Apr 25 i ii    i  `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Ike Naar
8 Apr 25 i ii    `* Re: do { quit; } else { }3Tim Rentsch
6 Apr 25 i i`* Re: do { quit; } else { }49Michael S
7 May 25 i `* Re: do { quit; } else { }6Wuns Haerst
6 Apr 25 +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
6 Apr 25 +- Re: do { quit; } else { }1David Brown
18 Apr 25 `- Re: do { quit; } else { }1Mikko

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal