On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:07:03 +0100, bart wrote:
for (n = NUM_ENTRIES; (n >= 0) && (node[n] != key); --n) continue;
using goto label would be as this
n=NUM_ENTRIES
L: if(!((n >= 0) && (node[n] != key))) goto Ex
--n; goto L;
Ex:
You are just showing a low-level transformation of a higher-level
construct. (I'm sure the professional folks here are familiar with
such transformations.)
You are not [seriously] suggesting to use that 'goto' based form
instead of the 'for' loop, do you?
Janis
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.