Re: Checking the loop variable after the loop has ended (Was: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { }))

On 24.04.2025 22:43, Rosario19 wrote:

On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:07:03 +0100, bart wrote:
 

   for (n = NUM_ENTRIES; (n >= 0) && (node[n] != key); --n) continue;

 
using goto label would be as this
 
     n=NUM_ENTRIES
L:   if(!((n >= 0) && (node[n] != key))) goto Ex
     --n; goto L;
Ex:
 

You are just showing a low-level transformation of a higher-level
construct. (I'm sure the professional folks here are familiar with
such transformations.)

You are not [seriously] suggesting to use that 'goto' based form
instead of the 'for' loop, do you?

Janis