Re: Bart's Language

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: Bart's Language
De : Keith.S.Thompson+u (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Keith Thompson)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 27. Apr 2025, 22:29:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None to speak of
Message-ID : <877c35pa37.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:
antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) writes:
[...]
Well, it is rather easy to see if variable is used within its
own initialization, so practically it is minor gap.  Of course,
there is problem with C standard:  IIUC depending on rest of
the code declarations as above are merely undefined behaviour
or even produce unspecified value.  So C compiler is
forbidden to stop compilation are report compile time error.
>
Valid responses to undefined behavior include "terminating a translation
or execution (with the issuance of a diagnostic message)".
>
That's true, but doing so is allowed only if the circumstances
of undefined behavior have occurred.  In the case of compiling
a declaration such as
>
    int a = a;
>
no undefined behavior has as yet occurred.

N3096 6.3.2.1p2 (lvalue conversion):

    If the lvalue designates an object of automatic storage duration
    that could have been declared with the register storage class (never
    had its address taken), and that object is uninitialized (not
    declared with an initializer and no assignment to it has been
    performed prior to use), the behavior is undefined.

Strictly speaking, `a` doesn't meet the definition of
"uninitialized", since it is declared with an initializer, but
its value is accessed before the initialization has been executed.
I'm not entirely certain that `int a = a;` has undefined behavior,
but it's unclear that the behavior is defined.

In other
words, if a compiler is able to prove that a program has undefined
behavior (that will occur on each execution), it can reject it at
compile time.
>
The program can be rejected, but not because of the rule about
terminating a translation.  The program can be rejected because
the program is not strictly conforming, and implementations are
not required to accept programs that are not strictly conforming.

I disagree, but we've gone over this before with no resolution.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Mar 25 * Bart's Language57bart
18 Mar 25 `* Re: Bart's Language56Waldek Hebisch
18 Mar 25  `* Re: Bart's Language55bart
18 Mar 25   `* Re: Bart's Language54Waldek Hebisch
18 Mar 25    +* Re: Bart's Language46bart
18 Mar 25    i+* Re: Bart's Language36David Brown
18 Mar 25    ii`* int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)35Kenny McCormack
18 Mar 25    ii +* Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)25Janis Papanagnou
18 Mar 25    ii i+- Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)1Kaz Kylheku
19 Mar 25    ii i`* Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)23David Brown
19 Mar 25    ii i +- Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)1Kaz Kylheku
19 Mar 25    ii i +* Re: int a = a14Keith Thompson
20 Mar 25    ii i i+* Re: int a = a12Tim Rentsch
20 Mar 25    ii i ii`* Re: int a = a11Keith Thompson
20 Mar 25    ii i ii +* Re: int a = a8David Brown
20 Mar 25    ii i ii i`* Re: int a = a7Keith Thompson
21 Mar 25    ii i ii i `* Re: int a = a6David Brown
21 Mar 25    ii i ii i  `* Re: int a = a5Keith Thompson
21 Mar 25    ii i ii i   +- Re: int a = a1David Brown
22 Mar 25    ii i ii i   `* Re: int a = a3Tim Rentsch
22 Mar 25    ii i ii i    `* Re: int a = a2Keith Thompson
28 Apr 25    ii i ii i     `- Re: int a = a1Tim Rentsch
29 Apr 25    ii i ii `* Re: int a = a2Tim Rentsch
29 Apr 25    ii i ii  `- Re: int a = a1Keith Thompson
20 Mar 25    ii i i`- Re: int a = a1David Brown
19 Mar 25    ii i +* Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)5Chris M. Thomasson
20 Mar 25    ii i i`* Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)4David Brown
20 Mar 25    ii i i `* Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)3bart
20 Mar 25    ii i i  `* Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)2David Brown
20 Mar 25    ii i i   `- Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)1wij
20 Mar 25    ii i `* Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)2Tim Rentsch
20 Mar 25    ii i  `- Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)1David Brown
18 Mar 25    ii +* Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)3David Brown
18 Mar 25    ii i`* Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)2Janis Papanagnou
19 Mar 25    ii i `- Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)1David Brown
19 Mar 25    ii `* Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)6Tim Rentsch
19 Mar 25    ii  +* Re: int a = a2Keith Thompson
27 Apr 25    ii  i`- Re: int a = a1Tim Rentsch
19 Mar 25    ii  +- Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)1David Brown
19 Mar 25    ii  `* Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)2Rosario19
20 Mar 25    ii   `- Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language)1Tim Rentsch
20 Mar 25    i`* Re: Bart's Language9Waldek Hebisch
21 Mar 25    i `* Re: Bart's Language8Keith Thompson
22 Mar 25    i  +* Re: Bart's Language5Waldek Hebisch
22 Mar 25    i  i`* Re: Bart's Language4James Kuyper
22 Mar 25    i  i +* Re: Bart's Language2Waldek Hebisch
23 Mar 25    i  i i`- Re: Bart's Language1James Kuyper
23 Mar 25    i  i `- By definition... (Was: Bart's Language)1Kenny McCormack
27 Apr 25    i  `* Re: Bart's Language2Tim Rentsch
27 Apr 25    i   `- Re: Bart's Language1Keith Thompson
18 Mar 25    `* Re: Bart's Language7bart
20 Mar 25     `* Re: Bart's Language6Waldek Hebisch
21 Mar 25      +* Re: Bart's Language4Kaz Kylheku
21 Mar 25      i`* Re: Bart's Language3bart
21 Mar 25      i `* Re: Bart's Language2Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 25      i  `- Re: Bart's Language1Tim Rentsch
21 Mar 25      `- Re: Bart's Language1bart

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal