Re: Rationale for aligning data on even bytes in a Unix shell file?

Am 27.04.2025 um 23:40 schrieb Kaz Kylheku:
 > 16 bit encodings are junk; not supporting them doesn't cause an
 > issue whatsoever.
I'm living in Germany and here filenames often have "umlaute".
 >> Win32 supported UCS-2 from the beginning and UTF-16 afaik since Windows
 >> 2000. With Unix there's even not a standard charset for the filesystem;
 >> each filename character is just an octet.
 > What is the standard charset of a Windows file name?
 > Be sure your answer covers FAT32 and such.
FAT not, but NTFS is Unicode.