Re: Regarding assignment to struct

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: Regarding assignment to struct
De : Keith.S.Thompson+u (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Keith Thompson)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 04. May 2025, 01:37:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None to speak of
Message-ID : <87ikmhp5x3.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
On Sat, 3 May 2025 01:14:46 -0700, Andrey Tarasevich wrote:
Virtually every C project relies on assignment of structures.
Passing-returning structs by value might be more rare (although
perfectly valid and often appropriate too), but assignment...
assignment is used by everyone everywhere without even giving it a
second thought.
>
There is a caveat, to do with alignment padding: will this always have a
defined value?

I don't believe so.  In a quick look, I don't see anything in
the standard that explicitly addresses this, but I believe that a
conforming implementation could implement structure assignment by
copying the individual members, leaving any padding in the target
undefined.

(A quibble about your wording: I don't believe padding has a "value"
as the term is used by the standard.)

The question is whether the "value" of a struct object consists
only of the values of its members.  I'd say it does, but unless
I'm missing something the standard doesn't say so explicitly.

Finally, why would you care?e

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 May 25 * Regarding assignment to struct84Lew Pitcher
2 May 25 +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
2 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct13Barry Schwarz
2 May 25 i`* That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)12Kenny McCormack
3 May 25 i `* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)11Lew Pitcher
3 May 25 i  +- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 May 25 i  +- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Janis Papanagnou
3 May 25 i  +* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)5Kaz Kylheku
3 May 25 i  i+* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)3Kaz Kylheku
5 May 25 i  ii`* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)2Janis Papanagnou
5 May 25 i  ii `- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Kaz Kylheku
4 May 25 i  i`- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Tim Rentsch
3 May 25 i  +- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1James Kuyper
4 May 25 i  `* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)2Tim Rentsch
4 May 25 i   `- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Lew Pitcher
2 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Waldek Hebisch
3 May 25 i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Lew Pitcher
3 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct51Andrey Tarasevich
3 May 25 i+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25 ii`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8Keith Thompson
4 May 25 ii `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct7James Kuyper
4 May 25 ii  +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Kenny McCormack
4 May 25 ii  +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
4 May 25 ii  `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Keith Thompson
5 May 25 ii   +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1James Kuyper
5 May 25 ii   +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
6 May 25 ii   `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
3 May 25 i+- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25 i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct40Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct39Andrey Tarasevich
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct16Michael S
5 May 25 i  i+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct14Andrey Tarasevich
5 May 25 i  ii`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct13Michael S
5 May 25 i  ii +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  ii `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct11Andrey Tarasevich
5 May 25 i  ii  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Michael S
6 May 25 i  ii  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  ii  `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  ii   +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Tim Rentsch
6 May 25 i  ii   i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  ii   +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
6 May 25 i  ii   `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Waldek Hebisch
6 May 25 i  ii    +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2David Brown
7 May 25 i  ii    i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
6 May 25 i  ii    `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct3Andrey Tarasevich
8 May 25 i  i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Tim Rentsch
8 May 25 i  i  `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct15Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  i+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct6Michael S
5 May 25 i  ii+- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Kenny McCormack
5 May 25 i  ii+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct3Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  iii`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Kaz Kylheku
6 May 25 i  iii `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
6 May 25 i  ii`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct7Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  i  `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct6Nick Bowler
6 May 25 i  i   `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct5Keith Thompson
7 May 25 i  i    `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Nick Bowler
7 May 25 i  i     +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Keith Thompson
8 May 25 i  i     i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Nick Bowler
8 May 25 i  i     `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
12 May 25 i  `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1NotAorB
3 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8David Brown
5 May 25 i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct7Muttley
5 May 25 i +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
5 May 25 i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct5Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Muttley
6 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2David Brown
6 May 25 i  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Muttley
6 May 25 i  `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Michael S
4 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct6Richard Damon
4 May 25 i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct5Michael S
4 May 25 i +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25 i i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
6 May 25 i +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
12 May 25 i `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Rosario19
4 May 25 +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
4 May 25 `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal