Sujet : Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct) De : lew.pitcher (at) *nospam* digitalfreehold.ca (Lew Pitcher) Groupes :comp.lang.c Date : 04. May 2025, 19:16:16 Autres entêtes Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID :<vv8atg$2f5m5$1@dont-email.me> References :12345 User-Agent : Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2)
On Sun, 04 May 2025 10:59:56 -0700, Tim Rentsch wrote: [snip]
For what it's worth, those are my thoughts on the question.
Thanks, Tim.
Your reply was exactly what I was looking for.
I, too, started my C journey with K&R, and even though that "Recent Changes to C" addendum (afaict, only published in the 1983 edition of "UNIX programmer's manual Volume 2", and (later) on Dennis Ritchie's Bell Labs webpage) talked about structs as closer-to-first-class objects, I never really tried them. Nor have I seen them used in the various open-source projects that I've read through.
Now, I have a clearer idea of the benefits and pitfalls of using structs in the way "Recent Changes" and the C standard say that they can be used.