Re: Regarding assignment to struct

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: Regarding assignment to struct
De : tr.17687 (at) *nospam* z991.linuxsc.com (Tim Rentsch)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 06. May 2025, 05:25:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <86zffq2wnn.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:

On Sat, 3 May 2025 21:42:37 -0400
Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> wrote:
>
Bigger than that, and you likely want to pass the object by address,
not by value, passing just a pointer to it.
>
That sort of thinking is an example of Knutian premature optimization.

I don't agree with this assessment.  First, the given suggestion is
a rule of thumb.  By their nature rules of thumb offer heuristics
that give guidelines likely to yield good results, but not
guaranteed to do so.  Second, a decision about whether to pass a
struct object or a pointer to said object is often one that is a
fair amount of work to undo, and so tends to be made early during
the time period of program development.  As such, it is useful to
follow a guideline likely to give good results, even if not always
optimal, because on average it will mean less work done overall.

I second Richard Damon's recommendation, with the understanding that
it is only a guideline, not an absolute, and as always subject to
later revision should that turn out to be called for (no pun
intended).

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 May 25 * Regarding assignment to struct84Lew Pitcher
2 May 25 +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
2 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct13Barry Schwarz
2 May 25 i`* That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)12Kenny McCormack
3 May 25 i `* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)11Lew Pitcher
3 May 25 i  +- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 May 25 i  +- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Janis Papanagnou
3 May 25 i  +* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)5Kaz Kylheku
3 May 25 i  i+* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)3Kaz Kylheku
5 May 25 i  ii`* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)2Janis Papanagnou
5 May 25 i  ii `- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Kaz Kylheku
4 May 25 i  i`- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Tim Rentsch
3 May 25 i  +- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1James Kuyper
4 May 25 i  `* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)2Tim Rentsch
4 May 25 i   `- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Lew Pitcher
2 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Waldek Hebisch
3 May 25 i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Lew Pitcher
3 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct51Andrey Tarasevich
3 May 25 i+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25 ii`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8Keith Thompson
4 May 25 ii `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct7James Kuyper
4 May 25 ii  +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Kenny McCormack
4 May 25 ii  +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
4 May 25 ii  `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Keith Thompson
5 May 25 ii   +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1James Kuyper
5 May 25 ii   +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
6 May 25 ii   `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
3 May 25 i+- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25 i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct40Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct39Andrey Tarasevich
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct16Michael S
5 May 25 i  i+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct14Andrey Tarasevich
5 May 25 i  ii`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct13Michael S
5 May 25 i  ii +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  ii `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct11Andrey Tarasevich
5 May 25 i  ii  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Michael S
6 May 25 i  ii  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  ii  `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  ii   +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Tim Rentsch
6 May 25 i  ii   i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  ii   +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
6 May 25 i  ii   `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Waldek Hebisch
6 May 25 i  ii    +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2David Brown
7 May 25 i  ii    i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
6 May 25 i  ii    `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct3Andrey Tarasevich
8 May 25 i  i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Tim Rentsch
8 May 25 i  i  `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct15Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  i+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct6Michael S
5 May 25 i  ii+- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Kenny McCormack
5 May 25 i  ii+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct3Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  iii`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Kaz Kylheku
6 May 25 i  iii `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
6 May 25 i  ii`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct7Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  i  `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct6Nick Bowler
6 May 25 i  i   `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct5Keith Thompson
7 May 25 i  i    `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Nick Bowler
7 May 25 i  i     +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Keith Thompson
8 May 25 i  i     i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Nick Bowler
8 May 25 i  i     `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
12 May 25 i  `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1NotAorB
3 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8David Brown
5 May 25 i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct7Muttley
5 May 25 i +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
5 May 25 i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct5Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Muttley
6 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2David Brown
6 May 25 i  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Muttley
6 May 25 i  `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Michael S
4 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct6Richard Damon
4 May 25 i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct5Michael S
4 May 25 i +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25 i i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
6 May 25 i +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
12 May 25 i `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Rosario19
4 May 25 +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
4 May 25 `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal