On Mon, 05 May 2025 01:34:16 -0700
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
>And more obviously, "%p" requires an argument of type void*, not>
int*.
That part of otherwise very good comment is unreasonably pedantic.
I don't have the same reaction. My sense is Keith was just being
thorough. Speaking for myself his statement wasn't needed, but
that condition might not hold for other readers. Given that his
comment is just one not-overly-long sentence, I don't think it's
too much to ask that readers already familiar with the point
simply skip over it.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.