Re: Regarding assignment to struct

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: Regarding assignment to struct
De : nbowler (at) *nospam* draconx.ca (Nick Bowler)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 06. May 2025, 20:06:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vvdmjb$3ilpe$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba git@gitlab.gnome.org:GNOME/pan.git)
On Mon, 05 May 2025 13:43:31 -0700, Keith Thompson wrote:
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:
Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> writes:
[...]
>
  #include <stdio.h>
>
  struct S { int a[10]; };
>
  int main()
  {
    struct S a, b = { 0 };
    int *pa, *pb, *pc;
>
    pa = &a.a[5];
    pb = &b.a[5];
    pc = &(a = b).a[5];
>
    printf("%p %p %p\n", pa, pb, pc);
  }
>
[...]
>
I think that code has undefined behavior.
>
Right.  [*]
[...]
[*] Assuming C11 semantics.  At best inadvisable under C99
semantics, and a constraint violation under C90 semantics.
 
What C90 constraint does it violate?  Both gcc and clang reject it
with "-std=c90 -pedantic-errors", with an error message "ISO C90
forbids subscripting non-lvalue array", but I don't see a relevant
constraint in the C90 standard.

I don't know about C90, but in C89 the above code violates the
constraint on the [] operator that "one of the expressions shall
have type ``pointer to object type.''" (3.3.2.1, first paragraph)

C89 (3.2.2.1, third paragraph) only describes conversion of lvalues with
array type into pointers.  No similar rule applies for an expression
with array type which is not an lvalue, so such expressions are not
converted to pointers.

So, given:

  struct { int a[10]; } a, b;
  /* ... */
  (a = b).a[5];

Since (a = b).a is not an lvalue, it is not converted to a pointer, so
neither operand of [] has pointer type, so a diagnostic is required.

I know that C11 introduced "temporary lifetime" to cover cases
like this.  In C99, the wording for the indexing operator implicitly
assumes that there's an array object; if there isn't, I'd argue the
behavior is undefined by omission.  I'm not aware of any relevant
change from C90 to C99.

The rule about conversions from arrays to pointers is different in C99
(n1124 6.3.2.1, third paragraph) compared to C89.  In particular,
"an lvalue that has type ``array of type'' ..." was changed to
"an expression that has type ``array of type'' ...".

Date Sujet#  Auteur
2 May 25 * Regarding assignment to struct84Lew Pitcher
2 May 25 +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
2 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct13Barry Schwarz
2 May 25 i`* That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)12Kenny McCormack
3 May 25 i `* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)11Lew Pitcher
3 May 25 i  +- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 May 25 i  +- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Janis Papanagnou
3 May 25 i  +* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)5Kaz Kylheku
3 May 25 i  i+* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)3Kaz Kylheku
5 May 25 i  ii`* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)2Janis Papanagnou
5 May 25 i  ii `- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Kaz Kylheku
4 May 25 i  i`- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Tim Rentsch
3 May 25 i  +- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1James Kuyper
4 May 25 i  `* Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)2Tim Rentsch
4 May 25 i   `- Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct)1Lew Pitcher
2 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Waldek Hebisch
3 May 25 i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Lew Pitcher
3 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct51Andrey Tarasevich
3 May 25 i+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct9Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25 ii`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8Keith Thompson
4 May 25 ii `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct7James Kuyper
4 May 25 ii  +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Kenny McCormack
4 May 25 ii  +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
4 May 25 ii  `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Keith Thompson
5 May 25 ii   +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1James Kuyper
5 May 25 ii   +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
6 May 25 ii   `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
3 May 25 i+- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25 i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct40Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct39Andrey Tarasevich
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct16Michael S
5 May 25 i  i+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct14Andrey Tarasevich
5 May 25 i  ii`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct13Michael S
5 May 25 i  ii +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  ii `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct11Andrey Tarasevich
5 May 25 i  ii  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Michael S
6 May 25 i  ii  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  ii  `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  ii   +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Tim Rentsch
6 May 25 i  ii   i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  ii   +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
6 May 25 i  ii   `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Waldek Hebisch
6 May 25 i  ii    +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2David Brown
7 May 25 i  ii    i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
6 May 25 i  ii    `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct3Andrey Tarasevich
8 May 25 i  i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Tim Rentsch
8 May 25 i  i  `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct15Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  i+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct6Michael S
5 May 25 i  ii+- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Kenny McCormack
5 May 25 i  ii+* Re: Regarding assignment to struct3Keith Thompson
5 May 25 i  iii`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Kaz Kylheku
6 May 25 i  iii `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
6 May 25 i  ii`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct7Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  i  `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct6Nick Bowler
6 May 25 i  i   `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct5Keith Thompson
7 May 25 i  i    `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct4Nick Bowler
7 May 25 i  i     +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Keith Thompson
8 May 25 i  i     i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Nick Bowler
8 May 25 i  i     `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Tim Rentsch
5 May 25 i  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
12 May 25 i  `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1NotAorB
3 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct8David Brown
5 May 25 i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct7Muttley
5 May 25 i +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
5 May 25 i `* Re: Regarding assignment to struct5Keith Thompson
6 May 25 i  +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Muttley
6 May 25 i  +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2David Brown
6 May 25 i  i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Muttley
6 May 25 i  `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Michael S
4 May 25 +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct6Richard Damon
4 May 25 i`* Re: Regarding assignment to struct5Michael S
4 May 25 i +* Re: Regarding assignment to struct2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
4 May 25 i i`- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1David Brown
6 May 25 i +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
12 May 25 i `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Rosario19
4 May 25 +- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Tim Rentsch
4 May 25 `- Re: Regarding assignment to struct1Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal