Sujet : Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types"
De : antispam (at) *nospam* fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 08. May 2025, 15:09:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : To protect and to server
Message-ID : <vvidv5$7r6u$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20221225 ("Pittyvaich") (Linux/6.1.0-9-amd64 (x86_64))
Tim Rentsch <
tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 01:24:49 -0700
Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>
about where they may or may not be used. Do you really have a
problem avoiding identifiers defined in this or that library
header, either for all headers or just those headers required for
freestanding implementations?
>
I don't know. In order to know I'd have to include all
standard headers into all of my C files
Let me ask the question differently. Have you ever run into an
actual problem due to inadvertent collision with a reserved
identifier?
Not in my own code. But I remember an old piece of code whose
author apparently thought that 'inline' is a perfect name for
input line. Few days ago I had trouble compiling with gcc-15
code which declares its own 'bool' type. The code is supposed to
compile using a wide range of compilers, so I am still looking
for "best" solution.
-- Waldek Hebisch