Re: encapsulating directory operations

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: encapsulating directory operations
De : jameskuyper (at) *nospam* alumni.caltech.edu (James Kuyper)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 24. May 2025, 00:29:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100r0d5$a4lc$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/22/25 22:08, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
On 2025-05-23, James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
On 5/22/25 19:15, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
...
POSIX is fairly decently supported on Windows by Cygwin.
>
Ignoring for the moment the different between "fairly decently" and
"fully, Does everyone who uses Windows do so, 100% of the time, through
Cygwin? I believe not - so POSIX is not in universal use.
...
No computer speaks POSIX natively; something must be installed.

Yes, and POSIX could not be properly referred to as "Universal" unless
it was universally installed - which it isn't. I can't believe that this
point is being debated.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 May07:06 * encapsulating directory operations147Paul Edwards
20 May08:27 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations21Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May10:33 i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations20Paul Edwards
21 May01:10 i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations19Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May01:23 i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations18Paul Edwards
21 May04:37 i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations17Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May11:00 i    +* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
22 May07:49 i    i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 May08:02 i    i `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
22 May00:51 i    `* Re: encapsulating directory operations13James Kuyper
22 May06:04 i     `* Re: encapsulating directory operations12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 May19:13 i      `* Re: encapsulating directory operations11James Kuyper
22 May23:46 i       `* Re: encapsulating directory operations10Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 May00:07 i        `* Re: encapsulating directory operations9James Kuyper
23 May00:15 i         `* Re: encapsulating directory operations8Kaz Kylheku
23 May00:26 i          +* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
23 May01:44 i          i+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
24 May03:26 i          i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 May01:10 i          `* Re: encapsulating directory operations4James Kuyper
23 May03:08 i           `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Kaz Kylheku
24 May00:29 i            `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2James Kuyper
24 May01:08 i             `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
20 May10:18 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations58Keith Thompson
20 May10:33 i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations14Richard Heathfield
20 May10:45 ii+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
20 May12:42 ii+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1David Brown
20 May14:55 ii+* Re: encapsulating directory operations7Kaz Kylheku
20 May15:05 iii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations6Richard Heathfield
20 May15:09 iii +* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Muttley
20 May15:15 iii i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
20 May15:48 iii `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
20 May16:02 iii  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Richard Heathfield
20 May16:28 iii   `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
23 May13:43 ii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Tim Rentsch
23 May14:27 ii `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Richard Heathfield
24 May06:32 ii  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Tim Rentsch
24 May06:54 ii   `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
20 May10:36 i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations43Paul Edwards
20 May13:23 i +* Re: encapsulating directory operations39David Brown
20 May14:47 i i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations38Paul Edwards
20 May15:37 i i +* Re: encapsulating directory operations10Richard Heathfield
20 May16:11 i i i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations9Paul Edwards
20 May16:43 i i i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations8Richard Heathfield
20 May22:15 i i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Paul Edwards
20 May23:50 i i i  i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
21 May02:11 i i i  +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May03:40 i i i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations4James Kuyper
21 May05:50 i i i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Richard Heathfield
21 May09:06 i i i    `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2David Brown
21 May09:27 i i i     `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
20 May17:19 i i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations27David Brown
20 May17:43 i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations6Richard Heathfield
20 May18:14 i i  i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Kaz Kylheku
20 May18:20 i i  ii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Richard Heathfield
20 May19:50 i i  ii +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
20 May20:34 i i  ii `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
21 May09:09 i i  i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1David Brown
20 May17:51 i i  +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
20 May18:09 i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Richard Heathfield
20 May19:34 i i  i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
20 May22:41 i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Paul Edwards
20 May23:02 i i  i+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Keith Thompson
21 May02:05 i i  i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May10:23 i i  i `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
20 May22:51 i i  +* Re: encapsulating directory operations9Paul Edwards
21 May05:31 i i  i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations8Richard Heathfield
21 May11:08 i i  i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations7Paul Edwards
21 May11:28 i i  i  +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Richard Heathfield
21 May16:00 i i  i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations5David Brown
21 May16:37 i i  i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations4Richard Heathfield
21 May18:21 i i  i    +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Michael S
22 May11:37 i i  i    `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2James Kuyper
22 May18:53 i i  i     `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Kaz Kylheku
20 May23:09 i i  +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
21 May09:27 i i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3David Brown
21 May11:46 i i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Paul Edwards
21 May15:46 i i    `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1David Brown
21 May01:12 i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May01:25 i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Paul Edwards
21 May02:03 i   `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
20 May14:53 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations62Kaz Kylheku
20 May15:12 i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations61Paul Edwards
20 May22:41 i `* Re: encapsulating directory operations60Keith Thompson
20 May23:38 i  `* Re: encapsulating directory operations59Paul Edwards
21 May00:09 i   +* Re: encapsulating directory operations5Paul Edwards
21 May00:22 i   i+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Keith Thompson
21 May01:18 i   i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Kaz Kylheku
21 May01:31 i   ii`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
21 May02:02 i   i`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 May00:18 i   +* Re: encapsulating directory operations44Keith Thompson
21 May00:57 i   i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations36Paul Edwards
21 May06:41 i   ii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations35Keith Thompson
21 May11:41 i   ii +* Re: encapsulating directory operations32Paul Edwards
21 May19:06 i   ii i+* Re: encapsulating directory operations29Keith Thompson
21 May19:22 i   ii ii+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Keith Thompson
22 May22:10 i   ii ii+* Re: encapsulating directory operations24Paul Edwards
22 May23:32 i   ii iii+* Re: encapsulating directory operations22Keith Thompson
23 May00:16 i   ii iiii+* Re: encapsulating directory operations7Paul Edwards
23 May02:38 i   ii iiiii+- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Keith Thompson
23 May03:28 i   ii iiiii+* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Kaz Kylheku
23 May05:27 i   ii iiiiii`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Keith Thompson
23 May06:08 i   ii iiiii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Janis Papanagnou
23 May16:09 i   ii iiii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations14Richard Harnden
22 May23:44 i   ii iii`- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Paul Edwards
22 May23:06 i   ii ii`* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Paul Edwards
21 May20:31 i   ii i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Kaz Kylheku
22 May22:52 i   ii `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Paul Edwards
21 May03:21 i   i`* Re: encapsulating directory operations7Kaz Kylheku
21 May03:26 i   +* Re: encapsulating directory operations7James Kuyper
21 May22:19 i   `* Re: encapsulating directory operations2Waldek Hebisch
21 May03:35 +* Re: encapsulating directory operations3Janis Papanagnou
22 May19:34 +- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Bonita Montero
25 May06:10 `- Re: encapsulating directory operations1Tim Rentsch

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal