Re: encapsulating directory operations

On 30/05/2025 16:37, David Brown wrote:

On 30/05/2025 01:05, Richard Heathfield wrote:

On 29/05/2025 22:50, Keith Thompson wrote:

Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> writes:

On 29/05/2025 21:45, Keith Thompson wrote:

 

C99 is also exactly the same as itself.

>
Yes, but it's different from C99.

>
I hope that was a typo.  If you really meant that C99 is different from
C99, I suggest that requires a bit more explanation.

>
Typo, of course. (9 is next to 0.) Alas, my typo-free days are over.
>

 You are, I believe, older than me.  At what age can I expect my typo-free days to start?
 :-)

I came up with a few answers to that, but you'll be glad to hear that I decided you didn't deserve any of them. ;-)
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within