Re: "C" code from bots (was Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Re: "C" code from bots (was Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me)
De : richard (at) *nospam* cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 31. May 2025, 20:23:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Message-ID : <101fkvg$dtt1$1@artemis.inf.ed.ac.uk>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
In article <101eqj0$13q67$1@dont-email.me>,
Richard Heathfield  <rjh@cpax.org.uk> wrote:

Probably not, as my C90/C99 test more or less illustrated. It
'knew' of a syntax rule, but failed to apply it correctly.

You have put your finger on it.  LLMs do not apply knowledge.

-- Richard

Date Sujet#  Auteur
30 May 25 * Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me13Richard Heathfield
31 May 25 +* "C" code from bots (was Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me)4Janis Papanagnou
31 May 25 i`* Re: "C" code from bots (was Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me)3Richard Heathfield
31 May 25 i `* Re: "C" code from bots (was Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me)2Richard Tobin
4 Jun 25 i  `- Re: "C" code from bots (was Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me)1Andrew Smallshaw
3 Jun 25 +* Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me5Ar Rakin
5 Jun 25 i`* OT: Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me4Vir Campestris
5 Jun 25 i +* Re: OT: Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me2Ar Rakin
5 Jun 25 i i`- Re: OT: Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me1Chris M. Thomasson
5 Jun 25 i `- Re: OT: Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me1Kaz Kylheku
9 Jun 25 `* Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me3Anton Shepelev
9 Jun 25  `* Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me2Roberto
9 Jun 25   `- Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me1Roberto

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal