Sujet : Re: Oh d-ai-ry d-ai-ry me
De : dash (at) *nospam* dominus.net (Roberto)
Groupes : comp.lang.cDate : 09. Jun 2025, 14:13:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1026mlu$i8a2$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb
After serious thinking Anton Shepelev wrote :
Richard Heathfield:
>
I asked: "Write a program that is valid C90 but invalid
C99."
ChatGPT said:
Certainly! To illustrate this, I'll write a C program that
is valid in C90 but invalid in C99.
>
This AI cannot speak English and answer questions as they
are asked:
>
1. You did not ask it /whether/ it were possible to write
such a program, so its answer "Certainly" either makes
no sense, or means agreement to fullfil your request.
>
2. If it means agreement, the following sentence makes no
sense, for what is it going to illustrate (if not the
possiblity of such a program)?
>
3. And then it cocludes with a blatant tautology,
promising to "illustrate" the wrting of a C90-but-not-
C99 program, by writing a C90-but-not-C99 program.
>
Its diction is like that of schoolchild taught to start an
answers by repeating the question, but not understanding how
to do it.
+ 1
Thanks to underlining it.
-- Roberto