Memory protection between compilation units?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c 
Sujet : Memory protection between compilation units?
De : mateusz (at) *nospam* x.invalid (Mateusz Viste)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 11. Jun 2025, 14:32:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : ...
Message-ID : <20250611153239.6bc43323@mateusz>
User-Agent : Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu)
This might not be a strictly C question, but it definitely concerns all
C programmers.

Earlier today, I fixed an out-of-bounds write bug. An obvious issue:

  static int *socks[0xffff];

  void update_my_socks(int *sock, int val) {
    socks[val & 0xffff] = sock;
  }

While the presented issue is common knowledge for anyone familiar with
C, *locating* the bug was challenging. The program did not crash at the
moment of the out-of-bounds write but much later - somewhere entirely
different, in a different object file that maintained a static pointer
for tracking a position in a linked list. To my surprise, the pointer
was randomly reset to NULL about once a week, causing a segfault.
Tracing this back to an unrelated out-of-bounds write elsewhere in the
code was tedious, to say the least.

This raises a question: how can such corruptions be detected sooner?
Protected mode prevents interference between programs but doesn’t
safeguard a program from corrupting itself. Is there a way to enforce
memory protection between module files of the same program? After all,
static objects shouldn't be accessible outside their compilation unit.

How would you approach this?

Mateusz


Date Sujet#  Auteur
11 Jun 25 * Memory protection between compilation units?53Mateusz Viste
11 Jun 25 +* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?6Josef Möllers
12 Jun 25 i+* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?2Michael S
13 Jun 25 ii`- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Mateusz Viste
12 Jun 25 i`* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?3Richard Heathfield
16 Jun 25 i `* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?2Rosario19
16 Jun 25 i  `- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Richard Heathfield
11 Jun 25 +- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Lew Pitcher
11 Jun 25 +* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?3David Brown
12 Jun 25 i`* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?2Mateusz Viste
12 Jun 25 i `- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1David Brown
11 Jun 25 +* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?3Opus
11 Jun 25 i+- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1wij
12 Jun 25 i`- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Mateusz Viste
11 Jun 25 +- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Kaz Kylheku
12 Jun 25 +* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?21Mateusz Viste
12 Jun 25 i`* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?20Kaz Kylheku
13 Jun 25 i +* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?2Mateusz Viste
13 Jun 25 i i`- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Kaz Kylheku
13 Jun 25 i `* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?17pozz
13 Jun 25 i  `* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?16Mateusz Viste
13 Jun 25 i   +* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?13Michael S
13 Jun 25 i   i+* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?2Richard Heathfield
14 Jun 25 i   ii`- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Michael S
13 Jun 25 i   i+- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Kaz Kylheku
14 Jun 25 i   i`* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?9Mateusz Viste
15 Jun 25 i   i `* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?8Waldek Hebisch
15 Jun 25 i   i  `* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?7Mateusz Viste
16 Jun 25 i   i   `* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?6Waldek Hebisch
16 Jun 25 i   i    +* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?3Kaz Kylheku
16 Jun 25 i   i    i`* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?2Waldek Hebisch
16 Jun 25 i   i    i `- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1James Kuyper
16 Jun 25 i   i    `* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?2Tim Rentsch
16 Jun 25 i   i     `- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Waldek Hebisch
13 Jun 25 i   +- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Kaz Kylheku
13 Jun 25 i   `- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1wij
12 Jun 25 +* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?2Mikko
12 Jun 25 i`- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Mateusz Viste
12 Jun 25 +* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?10Tim Rentsch
13 Jun 25 i+* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?5Bonita Montero
13 Jun 25 ii`* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?4wij
13 Jun 25 ii +- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Bonita Montero
13 Jun 25 ii `* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?2Keith Thompson
13 Jun 25 ii  `- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Tim Rentsch
13 Jun 25 i`* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?4Mateusz Viste
14 Jun 25 i `* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?3Tim Rentsch
14 Jun 25 i  `* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?2Mateusz Viste
1 Jul17:54 i   `- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Tim Rentsch
13 Jun 25 +* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?3Bonita Montero
13 Jun 25 i`* Re: Memory protection between compilation units?2Mateusz Viste
13 Jun 25 i `- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Kaz Kylheku
16 Jun 25 +- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1Mateusz Viste
21 Jun 25 `- Re: Memory protection between compilation units?1olcott

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal