Re: on named blocks concept

Bonita Montero wrote:

Am 07.11.2024 um 16:55 schrieb fir:
>

c++ has so many structural errors it makes it sh*t
(overaly all c++ is structural errors .. prbably one and only
thing interesting in c++ is operator overloading but it also
is badly done ofc)

>
What do you consider as a "structural error" with C++ ?
>

many things there are simply idiotic
liek for exampe concept of suntypes and sueprtypes
when for example you got some entity that
some {
sing(); swim(); fly(); }
the subtypes are things that
1{sing(); }
2 { swim();
3 { fly();}
4 {sing(); swim(); }
5 { swim(), fly()} ;
6 { sing(); fly();}
and supertype is  {
sing(); swim(); fly(); + do more}
not that idiotism of c++
also oop is hevily idiotoc ehen in normal languege you
can use and connect entities (just by putting them in visibility) without all that idiotic pointers
thsi i call syructural errors becouse you can do things in normal
structurally correct way in c++ this is total idiotism in that place