Re: A Famous Security Bug

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: A Famous Security Bug
De : jameskuyper (at) *nospam* alumni.caltech.edu (James Kuyper)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 22. Mar 2024, 19:38:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <utkfm6$311sb$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/22/24 13:20, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
On 2024-03-22, Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
...
Are you claiming that a function call is observable behavior?
>
Yes. It is the observable behavior of an unlinked translation unit.

In the context of the C standard, "observable behavior" is a term with a
precisely specified meaning which is NOT "behavior which can be
observed". That definition does not cover function calls, not even those
with external linkage. What the standard says about what optimizations
are permitted is in terms of "observable behavior", NOT "behavior which
can be observed".

Are you saying that the "call" instruction generated for the function
call is *observable behavior*?
>
Of course; it can be observed externally, without doing any reverse
engineering on the translated unit.

And the C standard imposes no requirement that such behavior occur as
described by the abstract semantics. Only actual observable behavior, as
that term is defined by the C standard, must occur as if those semantics
were followed - whether or not they actually were.

...
If an implementation doesn't generate
that "call" instruction because it's able to determine at link time that
the call does nothing, that optimization is forbidden?
>
The text says so. Translation units are separate; semantic analysis is
finished in translation phase 7; linking in 8.

Translation phases are specified solely for the purpose of expressing
the precedence of the corresponding semantic rules. The standard
explicitly allows for the phases to be intermingled or even done out of
order, so long as the observable behavior is behavior that would be
permitted if they had been done in the order specified.

Out of translation phases 1-7 we get a concrete artifact: the translated
unit. That has externally visible features, like what symbols it
requires. Its behavior with regard to those symbols can be empirically
observed, validated by tests and expected to hold thereafter.

And the standard imposes no requirements on those externally visible
features, only on some (but not ALL) of the behavior that results from
executing the program.


Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Mar 24 * A Famous Security Bug118Stefan Ram
20 Mar 24 +* Re: A Famous Security Bug108Kaz Kylheku
20 Mar 24 i+* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Keith Thompson
20 Mar 24 ii`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Keith Thompson
21 Mar 24 i+* Re: A Famous Security Bug35David Brown
21 Mar 24 ii`* Re: A Famous Security Bug34Kaz Kylheku
21 Mar 24 ii +* Re: A Famous Security Bug4Chris M. Thomasson
21 Mar 24 ii i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Chris M. Thomasson
22 Mar 24 ii i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Chris M. Thomasson
22 Mar 24 ii i  `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Chris M. Thomasson
21 Mar 24 ii +* Re: A Famous Security Bug28Keith Thompson
22 Mar 24 ii i+* Re: A Famous Security Bug24Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 24 ii ii+* Re: A Famous Security Bug19Keith Thompson
22 Mar 24 ii iii`* Re: A Famous Security Bug18Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 24 ii iii +* Re: A Famous Security Bug2James Kuyper
22 Mar 24 ii iii i`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 24 ii iii +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
22 Mar 24 ii iii `* Re: A Famous Security Bug14Keith Thompson
22 Mar 24 ii iii  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug13Kaz Kylheku
23 Mar 24 ii iii   `* Re: A Famous Security Bug12David Brown
23 Mar 24 ii iii    `* Re: A Famous Security Bug11Kaz Kylheku
23 Mar 24 ii iii     +* Re: A Famous Security Bug2David Brown
24 Mar 24 ii iii     i`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Kaz Kylheku
23 Mar 24 ii iii     `* Re: A Famous Security Bug8James Kuyper
24 Mar 24 ii iii      `* Re: A Famous Security Bug7Kaz Kylheku
24 Mar 24 ii iii       `* Re: A Famous Security Bug6David Brown
24 Mar 24 ii iii        `* Re: A Famous Security Bug5Kaz Kylheku
24 Mar 24 ii iii         +* Re: A Famous Security Bug3David Brown
27 Mar 24 ii iii         i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Kaz Kylheku
28 Mar 24 ii iii         i `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
24 Mar 24 ii iii         `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Mar 24 ii ii+- Re: A Famous Security Bug1James Kuyper
22 Mar 24 ii ii`* Re: A Famous Security Bug3David Brown
22 Mar 24 ii ii `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 24 ii ii  `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
22 Mar 24 ii i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug3James Kuyper
22 Mar 24 ii i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 24 ii i  `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1James Kuyper
22 Mar 24 ii `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
21 Mar 24 i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug70Anton Shepelev
21 Mar 24 i +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Keith Thompson
21 Mar 24 i +* Re: A Famous Security Bug15Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 24 i i+* Re: A Famous Security Bug13David Brown
22 Mar 24 i ii`* Re: A Famous Security Bug12Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 24 i ii +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1James Kuyper
22 Mar 24 i ii `* Re: A Famous Security Bug10David Brown
23 Mar 24 i ii  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug9Richard Kettlewell
23 Mar 24 i ii   +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Kaz Kylheku
23 Mar 24 i ii   +* Re: A Famous Security Bug2David Brown
23 Mar 24 i ii   i`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Kaz Kylheku
24 Mar 24 i ii   `* Re: A Famous Security Bug5Tim Rentsch
24 Mar 24 i ii    `* Re: A Famous Security Bug4Malcolm McLean
17 Apr 24 i ii     `* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Tim Rentsch
18 Apr 24 i ii      +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
18 Apr 24 i ii      `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Keith Thompson
28 Mar 24 i i`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Anton Shepelev
22 Mar 24 i +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Tim Rentsch
22 Mar 24 i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug52James Kuyper
22 Mar 24 i  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug51bart
23 Mar 24 i   +* Re: A Famous Security Bug5Keith Thompson
23 Mar 24 i   i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug4Kaz Kylheku
23 Mar 24 i   i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug3David Brown
23 Mar 24 i   i  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2bart
24 Mar 24 i   i   `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
23 Mar 24 i   `* Re: A Famous Security Bug45James Kuyper
23 Mar 24 i    `* Re: A Famous Security Bug44bart
23 Mar 24 i     +* Re: A Famous Security Bug37David Brown
23 Mar 24 i     i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug36bart
24 Mar 24 i     i +* Re: A Famous Security Bug29David Brown
24 Mar 24 i     i i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug28bart
24 Mar 24 i     i i +* Re: A Famous Security Bug12Keith Thompson
25 Mar 24 i     i i i+- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i i+* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i i ii+- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i ii`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Keith Thompson
25 Mar 24 i     i i i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug7bart
25 Mar 24 i     i i i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug6Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i i i  +* Re: A Famous Security Bug4bart
25 Mar 24 i     i i i  i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug3David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i i  i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Malcolm McLean
25 Mar 24 i     i i i  i  `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i i i  `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug15David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug14Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i i   `* Re: A Famous Security Bug13David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i    +* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i i    i+- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i    i`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1bart
25 Mar 24 i     i i    `* Re: A Famous Security Bug9bart
25 Mar 24 i     i i     +* Re: A Famous Security Bug7Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i i     i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug6bart
25 Mar 24 i     i i     i +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i     i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug4Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i i     i  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug3bart
26 Mar 24 i     i i     i   `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Michael S
26 Mar 24 i     i i     i    `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1bart
25 Mar 24 i     i i     `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
24 Mar 24 i     i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug6Michael S
24 Mar 24 i     i  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug5bart
25 Mar 24 i     i   +* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i   i`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i   +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
28 Mar 24 i     i   `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1James Kuyper
23 Mar 24 i     +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Tim Rentsch
24 Mar 24 i     +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Michael S
24 Mar 24 i     +* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Michael S
28 Mar 24 i     `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1James Kuyper
20 Mar 24 +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Joerg Mertens
20 Mar 24 +* Re: A Famous Security Bug5Chris M. Thomasson
27 Mar 24 `* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Stefan Ram

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal