Re: A Famous Security Bug

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: A Famous Security Bug
De : david.brown (at) *nospam* hesbynett.no (David Brown)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 25. Mar 2024, 10:58:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <utrebt$102ht$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
On 25/03/2024 03:12, bart wrote:
On 24/03/2024 23:39, Michael S wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2024 23:07:44 +0000
bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
>
On 24/03/2024 20:49, Keith Thompson wrote:
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
[...]
But what people want are the conveniences and familiarity of a HLL,
without the bloody-mindedness of an optimising C compiler.
[...]
>
Exactly which people want that?
>
The evidence suggests that, while some people undoubtedly want that
(and it's a perfectly legitimate desire), there isn't enough demand
to induce anyone to actually produce such a thing and for it to
catch on. Developers have had decades to define and implement the
kind of language you're talking about.  Why haven't they?
Perhaps many settle for using C but using a lesser C compiler or one
with optimisation turned off.
>
>
What is "lesser C compiler"?
Something like IAR ? Yes, people use it.
Something like TI? People use it when they have no other choice.
20 years ago there were Diab Data, Kiel and few others. I didn't hear
about them lately.
Microchip, I'd guess, still has its own compilers for many of their
families, but that's because they have to. "Bigger" compilers dont want
to support this chips.
On the opposite edge of scale, IBM has compilers for their mainframes
and for POWER/AIX. The former are used widely. The later are quickly
losing to "bigger' compilers running on the same platform.
 
As to tcc, mcc, lccwin etc... those only used by hobbyists.
 AFAIK lccwin can be used commercially.
"/Can/ be used commercially" does not imply "/is/ used professionally". I'm sure there are some people who use it in their work, but I would expect that in any statistics about compiler usage, it would be in the "Others < 0.1%" category.

I guess you mean companies using big tools and big ecosystems that need equally big compilers to go with them.
 I mainly use, and develop, small, nippy tools and would rate them above above any of the big, glossy ones.
 
Then you use a different rating system than the vast majority of professionals.  That, of course, is your free choice to make - just don't be surprised when others disagree with you.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
20 Mar 24 * A Famous Security Bug118Stefan Ram
20 Mar 24 +* Re: A Famous Security Bug108Kaz Kylheku
20 Mar 24 i+* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Keith Thompson
20 Mar 24 ii`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Keith Thompson
21 Mar 24 i+* Re: A Famous Security Bug35David Brown
21 Mar 24 ii`* Re: A Famous Security Bug34Kaz Kylheku
21 Mar 24 ii +* Re: A Famous Security Bug4Chris M. Thomasson
21 Mar 24 ii i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Chris M. Thomasson
22 Mar 24 ii i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Chris M. Thomasson
22 Mar 24 ii i  `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Chris M. Thomasson
21 Mar 24 ii +* Re: A Famous Security Bug28Keith Thompson
22 Mar 24 ii i+* Re: A Famous Security Bug24Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 24 ii ii+* Re: A Famous Security Bug19Keith Thompson
22 Mar 24 ii iii`* Re: A Famous Security Bug18Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 24 ii iii +* Re: A Famous Security Bug2James Kuyper
22 Mar 24 ii iii i`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 24 ii iii +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
22 Mar 24 ii iii `* Re: A Famous Security Bug14Keith Thompson
22 Mar 24 ii iii  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug13Kaz Kylheku
23 Mar 24 ii iii   `* Re: A Famous Security Bug12David Brown
23 Mar 24 ii iii    `* Re: A Famous Security Bug11Kaz Kylheku
23 Mar 24 ii iii     +* Re: A Famous Security Bug2David Brown
24 Mar 24 ii iii     i`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Kaz Kylheku
23 Mar 24 ii iii     `* Re: A Famous Security Bug8James Kuyper
24 Mar 24 ii iii      `* Re: A Famous Security Bug7Kaz Kylheku
24 Mar 24 ii iii       `* Re: A Famous Security Bug6David Brown
24 Mar 24 ii iii        `* Re: A Famous Security Bug5Kaz Kylheku
24 Mar 24 ii iii         +* Re: A Famous Security Bug3David Brown
27 Mar 24 ii iii         i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Kaz Kylheku
28 Mar 24 ii iii         i `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
24 Mar 24 ii iii         `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Chris M. Thomasson
22 Mar 24 ii ii+- Re: A Famous Security Bug1James Kuyper
22 Mar 24 ii ii`* Re: A Famous Security Bug3David Brown
22 Mar 24 ii ii `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 24 ii ii  `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
22 Mar 24 ii i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug3James Kuyper
22 Mar 24 ii i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 24 ii i  `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1James Kuyper
22 Mar 24 ii `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
21 Mar 24 i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug70Anton Shepelev
21 Mar 24 i +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Keith Thompson
21 Mar 24 i +* Re: A Famous Security Bug15Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 24 i i+* Re: A Famous Security Bug13David Brown
22 Mar 24 i ii`* Re: A Famous Security Bug12Kaz Kylheku
22 Mar 24 i ii +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1James Kuyper
22 Mar 24 i ii `* Re: A Famous Security Bug10David Brown
23 Mar 24 i ii  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug9Richard Kettlewell
23 Mar 24 i ii   +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Kaz Kylheku
23 Mar 24 i ii   +* Re: A Famous Security Bug2David Brown
23 Mar 24 i ii   i`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Kaz Kylheku
24 Mar 24 i ii   `* Re: A Famous Security Bug5Tim Rentsch
24 Mar 24 i ii    `* Re: A Famous Security Bug4Malcolm McLean
17 Apr 24 i ii     `* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Tim Rentsch
18 Apr 24 i ii      +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
18 Apr 24 i ii      `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Keith Thompson
28 Mar 24 i i`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Anton Shepelev
22 Mar 24 i +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Tim Rentsch
22 Mar 24 i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug52James Kuyper
22 Mar 24 i  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug51bart
23 Mar 24 i   +* Re: A Famous Security Bug5Keith Thompson
23 Mar 24 i   i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug4Kaz Kylheku
23 Mar 24 i   i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug3David Brown
23 Mar 24 i   i  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2bart
24 Mar 24 i   i   `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
23 Mar 24 i   `* Re: A Famous Security Bug45James Kuyper
23 Mar 24 i    `* Re: A Famous Security Bug44bart
23 Mar 24 i     +* Re: A Famous Security Bug37David Brown
23 Mar 24 i     i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug36bart
24 Mar 24 i     i +* Re: A Famous Security Bug29David Brown
24 Mar 24 i     i i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug28bart
24 Mar 24 i     i i +* Re: A Famous Security Bug12Keith Thompson
25 Mar 24 i     i i i+- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i i+* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i i ii+- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i ii`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Keith Thompson
25 Mar 24 i     i i i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug7bart
25 Mar 24 i     i i i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug6Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i i i  +* Re: A Famous Security Bug4bart
25 Mar 24 i     i i i  i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug3David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i i  i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Malcolm McLean
25 Mar 24 i     i i i  i  `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i i i  `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug15David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug14Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i i   `* Re: A Famous Security Bug13David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i    +* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i i    i+- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i    i`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1bart
25 Mar 24 i     i i    `* Re: A Famous Security Bug9bart
25 Mar 24 i     i i     +* Re: A Famous Security Bug7Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i i     i`* Re: A Famous Security Bug6bart
25 Mar 24 i     i i     i +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
25 Mar 24 i     i i     i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug4Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i i     i  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug3bart
26 Mar 24 i     i i     i   `* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Michael S
26 Mar 24 i     i i     i    `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1bart
25 Mar 24 i     i i     `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
24 Mar 24 i     i `* Re: A Famous Security Bug6Michael S
24 Mar 24 i     i  `* Re: A Famous Security Bug5bart
25 Mar 24 i     i   +* Re: A Famous Security Bug2Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i   i`- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Michael S
25 Mar 24 i     i   +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1David Brown
28 Mar 24 i     i   `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1James Kuyper
23 Mar 24 i     +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Tim Rentsch
24 Mar 24 i     +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Michael S
24 Mar 24 i     +* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Michael S
28 Mar 24 i     `- Re: A Famous Security Bug1James Kuyper
20 Mar 24 +- Re: A Famous Security Bug1Joerg Mertens
20 Mar 24 +* Re: A Famous Security Bug5Chris M. Thomasson
27 Mar 24 `* Re: A Famous Security Bug3Stefan Ram

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal