Re: C23 thoughts and opinions - why so conservative?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: C23 thoughts and opinions - why so conservative?
De : bc (at) *nospam* freeuk.com (bart)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 24. May 2024, 20:38:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v2qmqo$2epqb$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 24/05/2024 17:22, Michael S wrote:
On Fri, 24 May 2024 17:57:35 +0200
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:
>
>
I can't say I have ever seen it as an effort.  Almost all my C
"modules" come in pairs - "file.h" and "file.c".  All non-local
variables (and all functions) are either static and declared only in
"file.c", or they are externally linked and have an "extern"
declaration in "file.h" and a definition (with or without
initialisation) in "file.c" (which #includes "file.h").  It is a very
simple and clean arrangement, easily checked by gcc warnings, and
there are never any undetected conflicts.
>
 Declaration/definition pair is repeating yourself, which is not a good
think.
Of course, the same applies to declaration/definition of externally
visible functions, but somehow in case of functions I am more tolerant
to repetitions than in case of variable. Probably, a psychological
phenomenon - I feel that functions are less trivial, so repetition is
less wasteful.
But I'd like to get rid of these repetitions to, I just did not figure
out a way to do it that does not compromise even more important concern
of seperation between interface and implementation (yes, I dislike Java
for that reason too).
>
I normally use a private systems language which some here have claimed is just C with a different syntax.
Nevertheless, this particular problem has been solved:
* There is only a single definition of any function, variable, type, struct, enum or macro
* No separate declarations are needed. Definitions can appear in any order
* There are no header files
* Exported definitions have a 'global' atribute
It also has a module scheme so that, for example, only the lead module of a program needs to be submitted to the compiler.
C's facilities for this stuff are quite crude. It would be difficult to retro-fit a scheme like mine.
At best a separate preprocessing pass can done before normal compilation, which can produce the necessary declarations. Or perhaps a clever IDE can generate some of this stuff.
But working only with the raw language as it is now, the tidiest solution is the .h/.c file pairs that have been mentioned.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 May 24 * C23 thoughts and opinions524David Brown
22 May 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions355Thiago Adams
22 May 24 i+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions352David Brown
22 May 24 ii+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions22Thiago Adams
23 May 24 iii`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions21David Brown
23 May 24 iii `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions20Thiago Adams
23 May 24 iii  +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions18David Brown
23 May 24 iii  i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions17Thiago Adams
23 May 24 iii  i `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions16Keith Thompson
24 May 24 iii  i  +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1David Brown
24 May 24 iii  i  `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions14Thiago Adams
24 May 24 iii  i   `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions13Keith Thompson
24 May 24 iii  i    `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions12Thiago Adams
24 May 24 iii  i     `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions11Keith Thompson
25 May 24 iii  i      `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions10Thiago Adams
25 May 24 iii  i       +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions4Keith Thompson
25 May 24 iii  i       i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions3Thiago Adams
25 May 24 iii  i       i `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2David Brown
26 May 24 iii  i       i  `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Keith Thompson
25 May 24 iii  i       `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions5David Brown
25 May 24 iii  i        `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions4Thiago Adams
25 May 24 iii  i         +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2David Brown
26 May 24 iii  i         i`- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1bart
6 Jun 24 iii  i         `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Thiago Adams
23 May 24 iii  `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Thiago Adams
23 May 24 ii+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions323Keith Thompson
23 May 24 iii+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions313Thiago Adams
23 May 24 iiii`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions312bart
23 May 24 iiii +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions309David Brown
23 May 24 iiii i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions308Keith Thompson
24 May 24 iiii i +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1David Brown
25 May 24 iiii i +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions305Keith Thompson
25 May 24 iiii i i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions304David Brown
26 May 24 iiii i i `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions303Keith Thompson
26 May 24 iiii i i  +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions300David Brown
26 May 24 iiii i i  i+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions17bart
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions16Michael S
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions15bart
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii  `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions14Michael S
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii   +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions3bart
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii   i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Michael S
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii   i `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1bart
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii   +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions5Malcolm McLean
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii   i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions4Michael S
27 May 24 iiii i i  ii   i `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 May 24 iiii i i  ii   i  +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Chris M. Thomasson
27 May 24 iiii i i  ii   i  `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1David Brown
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii   +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Michael S
26 May 24 iiii i i  ii   +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1bart
27 May 24 iiii i i  ii   +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Keith Thompson
27 May 24 iiii i i  ii   `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 May 24 iiii i i  ii    `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Michael S
26 May 24 iiii i i  i+- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Thiago Adams
27 May 24 iiii i i  i+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions66Keith Thompson
27 May 24 iiii i i  ii+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions62David Brown
28 May 24 iiii i i  iii`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions61Keith Thompson
28 May 24 iiii i i  iii `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions60David Brown
28 May 24 iiii i i  iii  `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions59Keith Thompson
28 May 24 iiii i i  iii   +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Michael S
29 May 24 iiii i i  iii   `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions57David Brown
14 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii    `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions56Keith Thompson
15 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions12bart
15 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions11David Brown
15 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions10bart
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i  +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i  i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions4bart
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i  i +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i  i `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Chris M. Thomasson
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i  i  `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i  `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions4David Brown
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i   `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions3bart
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i    +- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1David Brown
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i    `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Michael S
15 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions3David Brown
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     i `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1David Brown
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii     `* Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)40Keith Thompson
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      +* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)20David Brown
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      i+* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)18Keith Thompson
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii+* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      iii`- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1Keith Thompson
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii`* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)15David Brown
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii +* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)6Keith Thompson
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii i`* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)5David Brown
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii i `* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)4Kaz Kylheku
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii i  `* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)3Michael S
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii i   +- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1bart
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii i   `- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1Michael S
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii `* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii  +* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)6David Brown
21 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii  i`* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii  i +* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)3David Brown
22 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii  i i`* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii  i i `- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1David Brown
21 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii  i `- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1James Kuyper
19 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      ii  `- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1Keith Thompson
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      i`- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      +* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)5Richard Kettlewell
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      i+- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1Richard Kettlewell
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      i`* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)3Keith Thompson
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      i +- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
18 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      i `- Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)1Richard Kettlewell
17 Jun 24 iiii i i  iii      `* Re: Hex string literals (was Re: C23 thoughts and opinions)14bart
28 May 24 iiii i i  ii+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Keith Thompson
28 May 24 iiii i i  ii`- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Malcolm McLean
27 May 24 iiii i i  i+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions121Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 May 24 iiii i i  i`* xxd -i vs DIY Was: C23 thoughts and opinions94Michael S
28 May 24 iiii i i  `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Keith Thompson
12 Jun 24 iiii i `- Re: C23 thoughts and opinions1Bonita Montero
23 May 24 iiii `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Keith Thompson
23 May 24 iii+* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions7Thiago Adams
23 May 24 iii`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2David Brown
23 May 24 ii`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions6Michael S
23 May 24 i`* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 May 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions10Malcolm McLean
22 May 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions9Chris M. Thomasson
23 May 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
23 May 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions14Michael S
23 May 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions - why so conservative?37Michael S
23 May 24 +* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions94Bonita Montero
25 May 24 `* Re: C23 thoughts and opinions2Thiago Adams

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal