Re: Baby X is bor nagain

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: Baby X is bor nagain
De : david.brown (at) *nospam* hesbynett.no (David Brown)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 19. Jun 2024, 11:42:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v4ucmn$1u14i$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
On 19/06/2024 11:25, Malcolm McLean wrote:
On 18/06/2024 23:49, Keith Thompson wrote:
Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> writes:
[...]
And it didn't take long to get Python to sort the list alphabetically,
but there seemed no way in to the sort comparision function
itself. And I had to give up.
>
<OT>
https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#sorted
https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#list.sort
</OT>
>
key specifies a function of one argument that is used to extract a comparison key from each element in iterable (for example, key=str.lower). The default value is None (compare the elements directly).
 You see the problem. I can sort on any field. I can sort alphaetically upwards and downwards. But I don't want to do that. I want to use a non-alphabetical comaprison function on two fields, and I need to specify that myself, because it's impossible that it is available anywhere. And that is to sort alphalbetically, except where the strings match except for an emedded "_L_" or "_D_" where the string wth the embedded "L" shoud be treated as closer to A than the string with the emebdded "_D_".
 
def LD_key(n) :
if "_L" in n : return (0, n)
if "_D_" in n : return (1, n)
return (2, n)
Now you have a key function that will put all names containing "_L_" first, then all names containing "_D_", then everything else, with alphabetic sorting within those groups.
There is no problem here - you just have to think about things in a different way.
(I don't know why Python 3 dropped the comparison function support from sort()/sorted().  It might be that a key function is more efficient, since you call it once for each item rather than once for each comparison.)

And I'm sure there is some way to achiev e this. But in C, it s achieved simply by declaring that qsort takes a function pointer to user-supplied code.
 
Yes, there is some way to achieve this all in Python.  And like pretty much every other question that is commonly asked, google will tell you the answer.  Sometimes things seem hard - then you do a little research, learn a bit, and then its easy.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
12 Jun 24 * Re: Baby X is bor nagain314Bonita Montero
12 Jun 24 +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain311David Brown
12 Jun 24 i+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Malcolm McLean
12 Jun 24 ii`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
12 Jun 24 i+- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Bonita Montero
12 Jun 24 i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain307bart
12 Jun 24 i +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain4Bonita Montero
12 Jun 24 i i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3bart
12 Jun 24 i i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Bonita Montero
12 Jun 24 i i  `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1bart
12 Jun 24 i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain302David Brown
12 Jun 24 i  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain301Michael S
12 Jun 24 i   +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Malcolm McLean
13 Jun 24 i   `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain299David Brown
13 Jun 24 i    +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain5bart
13 Jun 24 i    i+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3tTh
13 Jun 24 i    ii`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2bart
14 Jun 24 i    ii `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Bonita Montero
13 Jun 24 i    i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Michael S
13 Jun 24 i    `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain293Michael S
14 Jun 24 i     +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3David Brown
14 Jun 24 i     i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2bart
15 Jun 24 i     i `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
17 Jun 24 i     `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain289James Kuyper
17 Jun 24 i      +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain86Kaz Kylheku
17 Jun 24 i      i+- Are Javascript and Python similarly slow ? (Was: Baby X is bor nagain)1Michael S
17 Jun 24 i      i+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Michael S
18 Jun 24 i      ii`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Tim Rentsch
17 Jun 24 i      i+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain80David Brown
18 Jun 24 i      ii`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain79Michael S
18 Jun 24 i      ii `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain78David Brown
18 Jun 24 i      ii  +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain7bart
18 Jun 24 i      ii  i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain6David Brown
18 Jun 24 i      ii  i +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2bart
18 Jun 24 i      ii  i i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
18 Jun 24 i      ii  i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3DFS
18 Jun 24 i      ii  i  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Mark Bourne
18 Jun 24 i      ii  i   `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1DFS
18 Jun 24 i      ii  +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3Malcolm McLean
18 Jun 24 i      ii  i+- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
18 Jun 24 i      ii  i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Mark Bourne
18 Jun 24 i      ii  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain67Michael S
18 Jun 24 i      ii   +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain65Malcolm McLean
18 Jun 24 i      ii   i+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain59Keith Thompson
19 Jun 24 i      ii   ii`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain58Malcolm McLean
19 Jun 24 i      ii   ii +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain56David Brown
19 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain55Malcolm McLean
19 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain54David Brown
19 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain53Malcolm McLean
19 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i   +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain10bart
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i   i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain9David Brown
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i   i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain8bart
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i   i  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain7David Brown
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i   i   `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain6bart
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i   i    +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Michael S
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i   i    i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1bart
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i   i    `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3David Brown
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i   i     `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2bart
21 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i   i      `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i   `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain42David Brown
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i    `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain41Malcolm McLean
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i     +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i     `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain39Ben Bacarisse
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i      +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Malcolm McLean
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i      i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Ben Bacarisse
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i      +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain9Tim Rentsch
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i      i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain8Malcolm McLean
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i      i +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2James Kuyper
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i      i i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Keith Thompson
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i      i +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Vir Campestris
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i      i +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Keith Thompson
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i      i i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1vallor
21 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i      i +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Tim Rentsch
21 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i      i `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i      `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain27Keith Thompson
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i       `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain26Ben Bacarisse
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i        +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Michael S
21 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i        i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Ben Bacarisse
20 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i        +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Keith Thompson
21 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i        +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2James Kuyper
21 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i        i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Keith Thompson
22 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i        `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain20Tim Rentsch
23 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i         `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain19Ben Bacarisse
23 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i          +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain9James Kuyper
23 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i          i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain8Tim Rentsch
23 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i          i +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain4Ben Bacarisse
24 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i          i i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3Tim Rentsch
25 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i          i i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Ben Bacarisse
25 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i          i i  `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Tim Rentsch
24 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i          i `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3Keith Thompson
24 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i          i  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Tim Rentsch
24 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i          i   `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Keith Thompson
23 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i          `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain9Tim Rentsch
23 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i           +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Malcolm McLean
24 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i           i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Tim Rentsch
23 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i           `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain6Ben Bacarisse
24 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i            `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain5Tim Rentsch
25 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i             `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain4Ben Bacarisse
26 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i              `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3Tim Rentsch
26 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i               `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Ben Bacarisse
27 Jun 24 i      ii   ii i                `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Tim Rentsch
19 Jun 24 i      ii   ii `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Keith Thompson
19 Jun 24 i      ii   i`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain5David Brown
19 Jun 24 i      ii   `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
18 Jun 24 i      i+- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1James Kuyper
20 Jun 24 i      i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Vir Campestris
17 Jun 24 i      +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain199bart
17 Jun 24 i      `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3Malcolm McLean
12 Jun 24 `* Topicality is not your strong suit (Was: Baby X is bor nagain)2Kenny McCormack

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal