Re: Baby X is bor nagain

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: Baby X is bor nagain
De : bc (at) *nospam* freeuk.com (bart)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 01. Jul 2024, 15:14:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v5udks$13tjn$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 01/07/2024 13:09, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
 
Using products like tcc doesn't mean never using gcc. (Especially on Linux
where you will have it installed anyway.)
 The parenthetical remark is wrong.
You mean it is possible for a Linux installation to not have gcc preinstalled?
Sure, although in the dozen or two versions I've come across, it always has been. This is a different situation from Windows, where you can be fairly sure it won't be!
But in the context I'm talking about, if installing tcc is a possibility, then so is installing gcc. Unless you want to include also systems too small to run gcc, in which case I'd extend it to systems too small to run any compiler.
I think if talking about tcc vs. gcc, we need to assume a system capable of running either.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jul 24 * Re: Baby X is bor nagain27Ben Bacarisse
1 Jul 24 `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain26bart
1 Jul 24  +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Keith Thompson
2 Jul 24  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain24Ben Bacarisse
2 Jul 24   `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain23bart
3 Jul 24    `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain22Ben Bacarisse
3 Jul 24     `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain21bart
3 Jul 24      +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Kaz Kylheku
3 Jul 24      i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Kaz Kylheku
3 Jul 24      +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Ben Bacarisse
3 Jul 24      `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain17David Brown
3 Jul 24       +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain14bart
3 Jul 24       i+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain12DFS
3 Jul 24       ii+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3bart
3 Jul 24       iii`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Michael S
4 Jul 24       iii `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Malcolm McLean
3 Jul 24       ii+- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Ben Bacarisse
4 Jul 24       ii`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain7David Brown
2 Jan 25       ii `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain6DFS
2 Jan 25       ii  +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Phillip
2 Jan 25       ii  +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Waldek Hebisch
3 Jan 25       ii  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3David Brown
3 Jan 25       ii   `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2DFS
3 Jan 25       ii    `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
4 Jul 24       i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
3 Jul 24       `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Malcolm McLean
3 Jul 24        `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal