Re: Baby X is bor nagain

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: Baby X is bor nagain
De : bc (at) *nospam* freeuk.com (bart)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 03. Jul 2024, 01:23:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v625m8$1rn2r$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 03/07/2024 00:58, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
 
On 02/07/2024 16:00, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>
On 01/07/2024 13:09, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:
>
Using products like tcc doesn't mean never using gcc. (Especially on Linux
where you will have it installed anyway.)
The parenthetical remark is wrong.
>
You mean it is possible for a Linux installation to not have gcc
preinstalled?
I mean that saying "on Linux ... you will have it installed anyway" is
wrong.
>
Sure, although in the dozen or two versions I've come across, it
always has been.
I'm not sure what you mean by a "version".  Every version (in the sense
of release number) of a source-only Linux distribution will have gcc
installed, but is that all you mean?  Source-only distributions are rare
and not widely used.
>
No I mean binary distributions (unless the install process silently
compiled from source; I've no idea).
 Which ones?
 
I really, really don't remember. I've tinkered with Linux every so often for 20, maybe 25 years. You used to be able to order a job-lot of CDs with different versions. Few did much.
Then there were various ones I tried under Virtual Box. All had gcc.
I must have tried half a dozen, maybe more, on RPis. Those I know all had gcc too.  So did a laptop or two with Linux. As does WSL now.
I'm not sure what you're trying to do here.
I will admit that it might not be 100% certain that a Linux OS on a system on which someone is planning to run a C compiler will have gcc installed, although that is not my experience.
Will that do?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
1 Jul 24 * Re: Baby X is bor nagain27Ben Bacarisse
1 Jul 24 `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain26bart
1 Jul 24  +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Keith Thompson
2 Jul 24  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain24Ben Bacarisse
2 Jul 24   `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain23bart
3 Jul 24    `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain22Ben Bacarisse
3 Jul 24     `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain21bart
3 Jul 24      +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Kaz Kylheku
3 Jul 24      i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Kaz Kylheku
3 Jul 24      +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Ben Bacarisse
3 Jul 24      `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain17David Brown
3 Jul 24       +* Re: Baby X is bor nagain14bart
3 Jul 24       i+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain12DFS
3 Jul 24       ii+* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3bart
3 Jul 24       iii`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Michael S
4 Jul 24       iii `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Malcolm McLean
3 Jul 24       ii+- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Ben Bacarisse
4 Jul 24       ii`* Re: Baby X is bor nagain7David Brown
2 Jan 25       ii `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain6DFS
2 Jan 25       ii  +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Phillip
2 Jan 25       ii  +- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Waldek Hebisch
3 Jan 25       ii  `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain3David Brown
3 Jan 25       ii   `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2DFS
3 Jan 25       ii    `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
4 Jul 24       i`- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1David Brown
3 Jul 24       `* Re: Baby X is bor nagain2Malcolm McLean
3 Jul 24        `- Re: Baby X is bor nagain1Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal