Sujet : Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating itself emulating DDD
De : polcott333 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (olcott)
Groupes : comp.theoryDate : 04. Dec 2024, 00:08:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vio31i$dg23$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/3/2024 3:03 AM, joes wrote:
Am Mon, 02 Dec 2024 20:48:49 -0600 schrieb olcott:
On 11/28/2024 1:48 PM, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 28 Nov 2024 11:35:16 -0600 schrieb olcott:
On 11/28/2024 11:32 AM, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 28 Nov 2024 11:07:16 -0600 schrieb olcott:
On 11/28/2024 10:51 AM, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:47:10 -0600 schrieb olcott:
On 11/28/2024 10:27 AM, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:16:15 -0600 schrieb olcott:
On 11/28/2024 4:04 AM, joes wrote:
Am Wed, 27 Nov 2024 19:15:41 -0600 schrieb olcott:
On 11/27/2024 8:03 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/27/24 8:28 AM, olcott wrote:
On 11/27/2024 6:14 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> wrote:
On 11/26/2024 7:02 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/25/24 11:08 PM, olcott wrote:
On 11/24/2024 11:18 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/24/24 9:30 AM, olcott wrote:
On 11/23/2024 11:54 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/23/24 11:54 AM, olcott wrote:
On 11/23/2024 9:35 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/23/24 10:15 AM, olcott wrote:
On 11/23/2024 9:02 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/23/24 9:04 AM, olcott wrote:
On 11/23/2024 1:59 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-11-22 16:45:52 +0000, olcott said:
On 11/22/2024 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-11-21 15:32:38 +0000, olcott said:
On 11/21/2024 3:12 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-11-20 22:03:43 +0000, olcott said:
On 11/20/2024 3:53 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-11-20 03:23:12 +0000, olcott
said:
On 11/19/2024 4:12 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-11-18 20:42:02 +0000, olcott
said:
On 11/18/2024 3:41 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-11-17 18:36:17 +0000, olcott
said:
>
When DDD is emulated by HHH and DDD calls HHH(DDD) this call
never returns.
That's weird. Why can't HHH simulate itself?
I have already told you and conclusively proven that HHH does
emulate itself emulating DDD. I have told you this dozens of
times and my code continues to prove this.
I don't get it. HHH clearly halts in order to return a value. But
that value is "doesn't halt". Why does HHH, which does only a
partial simulation, report that itself (called by DDD) doesn't
halt?
https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm You just may not have the
required software engineering skill to get it. If you did then you
could just carefully study the code and see.
That's what I mean. I can see the code, but the code is wrong.
The code does do what it does do.
Yes, the wrong thing.
>
If HHH halts at all, it needs to return that HHH halts.
DDD emulated by any HHH cannot possibly halt.
You can fail to understand that, you can lie about that, it remains
immutably a verified fact none-the-less.
Yes, HHH can't simulate itself.
The code proves that HHH does emulate itself emulating DDD why lie?
The code proves that HHH aborts.
>
>
You said:
>>> HHH can't simulate itself.
That is WRONG !!!
HHH DOES EMULATE ITSELF PROVING THAT IT CAN EMULATE ITSELF.
We know that HHH halts. It doesn't simulate itself halting.
Please try and explain how you are not dishonest what you
try to change the subject from my rebuttal of your statement:
>>> HHH can't simulate itself.
That HHH does emulate itself emulating DDD proves
THAT IT CAN DO THIS.
-- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Geniushits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
…