Re: question about linker

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cl c  
Sujet : Re: question about linker
De : david.brown (at) *nospam* hesbynett.no (David Brown)
Groupes : comp.lang.c
Date : 04. Dec 2024, 13:08:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vipgns$rjqn$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
On 03/12/2024 17:12, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
On 03.12.2024 16:24, David Brown wrote:
On 03/12/2024 13:34, Bart wrote:
[...]
>
Of course lots of C programmers have never read the standards.  But they
generally know that they don't know these details, and don't try to
pretend that the language details that they don't know are confusing.
They simply get on with the job of writing clear C code as best they can.
 I feel an urge to point out that the C standard is not necessary to
understand concepts that can be read about in textbooks or inferred
(or just tried out, if the available sources are unclear about some
detail).
 
Sure.  And it is certainly /possible/ to know all the small details of C without ever reading the standards.  But it's quite unlikely.  This was a small detail of how declaring a function from inside a block interacts with a definition of the same function in the same unit.  That is not something that will occur often in real code - it only came up because Bart is an expert at thinking up things in C that confuse him.  In the real world, programmers simply don't do that kind of thing - and the kind of C programmer who is interested in these details will almost certainly also be interested in reading the standards.
Most C programmers never look at the standards - textbooks, decent reference sites (like www.cppreference.com), common sense, and trial and error with quality compilers is sufficient for most programmers.
There's nothing at all wrong with not knowing the whole language, or not having read the standards.  There's nothing wrong with saying "I find this thing in C confusing" when you don't know how it works.  But there /is/ something wrong with saying "C /is/ confusing" when you haven't learned how it works or consulted the standards and good references. The first is accepting personal responsibility, so that you can either learn about the feature or accept that it is a feature you want to avoid in your programming.  The second is trying to pass the buck - blame your tools, blame other people, blame anyone but yourself.  (If you find a feature in the language that you understand and have read about in the standards, and which a large proportion of programmers have trouble with - /then/ you have justification for saying that this particular feature of C is confusing.)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Nov 24 * question about linker382Thiago Adams
26 Nov 24 +* Re: question about linker16Thiago Adams
26 Nov 24 i`* Re: question about linker15Bart
26 Nov 24 i `* Re: question about linker14Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i  +* Re: question about linker2BGB
27 Nov 24 i  i`- Re: question about linker1Bart
27 Nov 24 i  +* Re: question about linker5David Brown
27 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: question about linker4Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i  i +* Re: question about linker2David Brown
27 Nov 24 i  i i`- Re: question about linker1Thiago Adams
2 Dec 24 i  i `- Re: question about linker1BGB
27 Nov 24 i  `* Re: question about linker6Michael S
27 Nov 24 i   `* Re: question about linker5Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i    `* Re: question about linker4Michael S
27 Nov 24 i     +- Re: question about linker1David Brown
28 Nov 24 i     +- Re: question about linker1Tim Rentsch
2 Dec 24 i     `- Re: question about linker1BGB
26 Nov 24 +* Re: question about linker20Bart
26 Nov 24 i`* Re: question about linker19Thiago Adams
26 Nov 24 i `* Re: question about linker18Bart
27 Nov 24 i  +* Re: question about linker3BGB
27 Nov 24 i  i`* Re: question about linker2fir
27 Nov 24 i  i `- Re: question about linker1BGB
27 Nov 24 i  `* Re: question about linker14Bart
27 Nov 24 i   +* Re: question about linker12Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i+- Re: question about linker1Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i`* Re: question about linker10Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i +* Re: question about linker6Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i i`* Re: question about linker5Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i i +* Re: question about linker3Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i i i`* Re: question about linker2Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i i i `- Re: question about linker1Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i i `- Re: question about linker1Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i `* Re: question about linker3Thiago Adams
27 Nov 24 i   i  `* Re: question about linker2Bart
27 Nov 24 i   i   `- Re: question about linker1Thiago Adams
28 Nov 24 i   `- Re: question about linker1Tim Rentsch
27 Nov 24 `* Re: question about linker345Waldek Hebisch
27 Nov 24  `* Re: question about linker344Thiago Adams
28 Nov 24   `* Re: question about linker343Keith Thompson
28 Nov 24    `* Re: question about linker342Thiago Adams
28 Nov 24     +* Re: question about linker337Bart
28 Nov 24     i`* Re: question about linker336Keith Thompson
29 Nov 24     i `* Re: question about linker335Bart
29 Nov 24     i  `* Re: question about linker334Keith Thompson
29 Nov 24     i   `* Re: question about linker333Bart
29 Nov 24     i    +* Re: question about linker3Keith Thompson
29 Nov 24     i    i`* Re: question about linker2Bart
29 Nov 24     i    i `- Re: question about linker1Keith Thompson
29 Nov 24     i    `* Re: question about linker329David Brown
29 Nov 24     i     `* Re: question about linker328Bart
29 Nov 24     i      +- Re: question about linker1Ike Naar
29 Nov 24     i      +* Re: question about linker325Michael S
29 Nov 24     i      i+* Re: question about linker322Bart
29 Nov 24     i      ii`* Re: question about linker321Michael S
29 Nov 24     i      ii +* Re: question about linker319David Brown
29 Nov 24     i      ii i`* Re: question about linker318Bart
29 Nov 24     i      ii i +* Re: question about linker164Keith Thompson
29 Nov 24     i      ii i i`* Re: question about linker163Bart
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i `* Re: question about linker162Keith Thompson
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  +* Re: question about linker95Waldek Hebisch
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  i+- Re: question about linker1Keith Thompson
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  i+* Re: question about linker3James Kuyper
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  ii`* Re: question about linker2Michael S
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  ii `- Re: question about linker1Tim Rentsch
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i`* Re: question about linker90David Brown
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i +* Re: question about linker88Bart
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i`* Re: question about linker87David Brown
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i `* Re: question about linker86Bart
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i  `* Re: question about linker85David Brown
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i   `* Re: question about linker84Bart
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    +* Re: question about linker78David Brown
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    i+* Re: question about linker72Janis Papanagnou
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    ii+* Re: question about linker70Bart
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iii+* Re: question about linker68David Brown
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii`* Re: question about linker67Bart
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii `* Re: question about linker66David Brown
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  +* Re: question about linker53Bart
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i`* Re: question about linker52David Brown
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i `* Re: question about linker51Bart
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i  `* Re: question about linker50David Brown
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i   `* Re: question about linker49Bart
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i    `* Re: question about linker48David Brown
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     +* Re: question about linker24Bart
5 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i`* Re: question about linker23David Brown
5 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i +- Re: question about linker1Janis Papanagnou
5 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i `* Re: question about linker21Bart
6 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i  `* Re: question about linker20David Brown
6 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i   `* Re: question about linker19Bart
6 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    +* Re: question about linker5Ike Naar
6 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i+- Re: question about linker1Bart
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i+- Re: question about linker1Keith Thompson
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i`* Re: question about linker2Bart
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i `- Re: question about linker1Keith Thompson
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    +* Re: question about linker10David Brown
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i`* Re: question about linker9Bart
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i `* Re: question about linker8David Brown
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i  `* Re: question about linker7Bart
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i   `* Re: question about linker6David Brown
7 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i    `* Re: question about linker5Bart
8 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i     +* Re: question about linker3Ben Bacarisse
8 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    i     `- Re: question about linker1David Brown
8 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     i    `* Re: question about linker3Waldek Hebisch
5 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     +* Re: question about linker15Waldek Hebisch
11 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  i     `* Re: question about linker8James Kuyper
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iiii  `* Re: question about linker12Bart
3 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    iii`- Re: question about linker1Janis Papanagnou
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    ii`- Re: question about linker1Bart
2 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    i`* Re: question about linker5Bart
4 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i i    `* Re: question about linker5Waldek Hebisch
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  i `- Re: question about linker1Janis Papanagnou
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  +* Re: question about linker44Bart
30 Nov 24     i      ii i i  +- Re: question about linker1Janis Papanagnou
1 Dec 24     i      ii i i  `* Re: question about linker21David Brown
30 Nov 24     i      ii i `* Re: question about linker153David Brown
5 Dec 24     i      ii `- Re: question about linker1Tim Rentsch
30 Nov 24     i      i`* Re: question about linker2Tim Rentsch
29 Nov 24     i      `- Re: question about linker1David Brown
28 Nov 24     `* Re: question about linker4Keith Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal